I don't think you realize the depth of Adobe creative suite hate, an entire generation of artists came up on Krita/Affinity because Adobe decided to vampire its customers.
Why would anyone help maintain this when they could vibe code their own though? Genuine question. As of the time I'm writing this there are already two other people linking their own Adobe clones in this comment section.
It takes a lot of tokens to vibecode something like this with the expected feature sets, and this domain is complex enough with enough edge cases and interactions such that it's infeasible to fully QA even programmatically.
It's just slop. Tried to install it via flatpak. It has flatpak instructions in the readme. It does not ship the flatpak files it references in the readme.
Missing and incomplete features, missing templates, presets and it's likely to be abandoned as issues will start to pile up.
The user experience is also not great with professional looking AI apps, I've just tried PhotoCraft and couldn't paste an image from the clipboard. Clone stamp doesn't have a live update, etc.
Another catch is that it's... PhotoShop. I'm not particularly a fan of the whole workflow. Creatives learned to live and work with it over the decades, so it works, but it's not really an intuitive tool.
I'd recommend looking into Affinity which is a merged version of PS+Illustrator. The product feels like it at least tries to be a little different. It's also free.
Though it was done roughly 1-2 months ago, a very busy work / private life kept me from finally releasing it. Interesting to see this being released on the same day. Though Pixellect has a different mission. Its not a clean room photoshop clone but more between Pixelmator and Photoshop and also features (I think) a bit more AI Integration. However Photocraft looks much more complete in terms of typical Photoshop features.
It was only 4 months ago that AI development was in question because there were no vibe-coded Photoshops. Here they are, and I think more will come.
Interesting but for photography at least, there's a massive hole: RAW support. What they've implemented is very limited and basic, nothing like parity with Lightroom or Photoshop. Just try loading a RAW photo into Lightroom/Photoshop and put the window next to Lightcraft/Photocraft - the results are completely different and not in a good way. Lightcraft's image looks like an amateur attempt at RAW processing from first principles, without any of the most basic colour profiles and adjustments that Lightroom applies. Photocraft doesn't even offer RAW processing, it just dumps the raster straight in.
I'd treat this as completely new, far from complete software heavily inspired by the Adobe Suite, rather than a "port".
But maybe folks who use workflows that don't involve RAW photos have better luck.
Or maybe you'll have better luck in a week when somebody familiar with RAW and a 20 year grudge against Adobe chooses to spend a day of tokens on the problem. Maybe me.
Rome wasn't built in a day, nor Adobe destroyed in a single git push. But they both shall fall.
That's exactly what I was thinking. It's only a matter of time. Surely the models, when well directed, can get most or all of the way there in short order.
I did this a few months ago and it's not simple: different sensors have different pixel arrangements, files can have different data structures, and the default tone mapping is provided by the app (so opening the same raw file in darktable vs preview will have different results). There are different algorithms for how you assemble the raw data as well, and the issue is that you can get something _passable_ that isn't _optimal_, and it's really hard for the LLM to recognize that something isn't right. Is it the pixel processing, or is it the tone mapping, or is that just how the image looked?
And on top of that, you need a bunch of different files from different sensors to test with. Canon, sony, apple, fuji, nikon, olympus, etc. -- if you're building a truly general application, that's a concern.
Or if you're like me and you shoot fuji, you just build a fuji raw parser and call it good. The "TAM of 1" world of software development...
And 500 levels of org tree, and grumpy customers that freak out if you change anything about their workflows, and decades of legacy code across dozens of micro-services, and backwards compatibility requirements with 20 year old formats...
Yeah, it's a really well defined problem space with quantifiable outcomes, so LLMs are very well suited to it.
For lopsy, the biggest issue I ran into was combinatorial bugs: certain sequences of tools and actions would cause a bug to occur that wasn't obvious from isolated tool testing. I solved it by having Claude generate complete projects, full documents with novel concepts chosen randomly, built in the browser with playwright. This continues to expose so much more than individual unit/tool tests, and I have an automated loop that addresses them. (And a bonus from that: I use the outputs to make tutorials to show what the tool can do).
Raw was a tough one when I tried it a few months ago -- I never thought about how individual color pixels on the sensor come together to form a color value for a point in an image file. Super interesting, and not at all standard between the different manufacturers. It's a hard problem for software to solve in a general way.
I find it awfully funny that your response to someone creating the entire Adobe software suite in a day is “the colours aren’t rich enough for my liking”
Unlimited slop works! Title kinda misleading (at least appears so to me). No rev. eng. (so "cleanroom" to be relevant) takes place. "ACS clone" would be more appropriate.
In two of its test cases, it changes the PSD on save so much that an export render differs. No RAW support. No folder sync or plugins. Limited brush support. It’s like the author never actually used their vibe-coded output and just decided it looked good enough.
One of the highlights in this for me is that we are starting to see clean room ports of software that companies would actually sue to protect.
Clearly the old "nobody would re-implement this" protection no longer works. I think we may stand on the brink of software losing a lot of it's magical DMCA protections, because it no longer matters. Or worse, the law becomes stricter.
I wonder if we're entering an era of boundless open-source clones and variants of proprietary software, from operating systems to games, products and services, perhaps even clones of entire companies.
I’m putting personal attention and tokens towards replacing Pioneer / Alpha Theta Rekordbox (music management for DJs).
The software is old and clunky, has a ton of features I don’t use, and can’t customize what I do use. And it’s enshittified with ads and popups and an expensive monthly subscription.
One big motivation for me is that it is FUN to rebuilt it with a coding agent. I’m learning a ton and the custom tools actually work.
Post AI - What is the future of making money with software? Desktop apps or SaaS? This certainly also would cut into the bottom line of software companies so they won't exist and then these companies are supposed to be the prime customers of the AI companies.
Can't understand what's happening.
PS: Anyone badmouthing the above rewrite is not understanding what's happening. Check back a year later for featur parity.
I wonder if software will be built inside of companies that have non-tech competencies going forward. The story of 2000-2025 was every traditional company becoming a tech company. The next 25 years might see tech companies without any offering besides "tech" being at a disadvantage because their entire offering is easily replicated.
In this hypothetical future, why would I (or my business) buy software from any company, when I can just prompt the equivalent into existence myself? We talk a lot about AI killing software engineering as a profession, but if the AI future comes, it will kill software development as a type of business.
There are several of these clones floating around now. Who is furthest along in functionality and community support? Have any of these attracted a community of contributors?
Wow! This actually gives a pretty promising alternative to GIMP on Linux. I was resigned in my fate to just deal with the awkwardness of GIMP and Inkscape after years of the creative cloud suite. It is clearly missing much at the moment, but if they can keep going this would be amazing. All packaged as AppImages so no need for the persistent junk running on the system.
[OP] bigwheels | 4 hours ago
https://github.com/storytold/vectorcraft (Illustrator)
https://github.com/storytold/filmcraft (Premiere)
https://github.com/storytold/lightcraft (Lightroom)
https://github.com/storytold/printcraft (Acrobat Pro)
https://github.com/storytold/effectcraft (After Effects)
https://github.com/storytold/designcraft (InDesign)
slowin | 3 hours ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49922904
[OP] bigwheels | 3 hours ago
handfuloflight | 4 hours ago
mzajc | 4 hours ago
CuriouslyC | 3 hours ago
knicholes | 3 hours ago
minimaxir | 3 hours ago
The "no one maintains AI slop" idiom is more for things which are bespoke and/or don't have much demand, and this clearly has demand.
mjr00 | 3 hours ago
minimaxir | 3 hours ago
blendergeek | 4 hours ago
Wheen | 3 hours ago
discordance | 3 hours ago
No doubt it’ll get better in time.
trollbridge | 3 hours ago
tiborsaas | 3 hours ago
The user experience is also not great with professional looking AI apps, I've just tried PhotoCraft and couldn't paste an image from the clipboard. Clone stamp doesn't have a live update, etc.
tiborsaas | 3 hours ago
I'd recommend looking into Affinity which is a merged version of PS+Illustrator. The product feels like it at least tries to be a little different. It's also free.
drcongo | 4 hours ago
ZeWaka | 3 hours ago
terhechte | 3 hours ago
Though it was done roughly 1-2 months ago, a very busy work / private life kept me from finally releasing it. Interesting to see this being released on the same day. Though Pixellect has a different mission. Its not a clean room photoshop clone but more between Pixelmator and Photoshop and also features (I think) a bit more AI Integration. However Photocraft looks much more complete in terms of typical Photoshop features.
It was only 4 months ago that AI development was in question because there were no vibe-coded Photoshops. Here they are, and I think more will come.
theseamusjames | 3 hours ago
Youden | 3 hours ago
I'd treat this as completely new, far from complete software heavily inspired by the Adobe Suite, rather than a "port".
But maybe folks who use workflows that don't involve RAW photos have better luck.
badlibrarian | 3 hours ago
Rome wasn't built in a day, nor Adobe destroyed in a single git push. But they both shall fall.
knowaveragejoe | 3 hours ago
Silhouette | 3 hours ago
"Hey ChatGPT, what would the sufficiently smart compiler argument look like in the LLM era?"
theseamusjames | 2 hours ago
And on top of that, you need a bunch of different files from different sensors to test with. Canon, sony, apple, fuji, nikon, olympus, etc. -- if you're building a truly general application, that's a concern.
Or if you're like me and you shoot fuji, you just build a fuji raw parser and call it good. The "TAM of 1" world of software development...
knicholes | 3 hours ago
theseamusjames | 3 hours ago
nvme0n1p1 | 3 hours ago
1. LLMs
2. an executive team that hates your customers. this problem with company culture goes back at least 13 years: https://fstoppers.com/video/adobes-ceo-deftly-dodges-questio...
Unfortunately any benefit from #1 is neutralized by #2
indy | 59 minutes ago
wg0 | 3 hours ago
theseamusjames | 3 hours ago
https://lopsy.art
egeozcan | 3 hours ago
I also let it build one btw: https://egeozcan.github.io/ketchup/ (not a PS clone, more amateur painting oriented)
theseamusjames | 3 hours ago
For lopsy, the biggest issue I ran into was combinatorial bugs: certain sequences of tools and actions would cause a bug to occur that wasn't obvious from isolated tool testing. I solved it by having Claude generate complete projects, full documents with novel concepts chosen randomly, built in the browser with playwright. This continues to expose so much more than individual unit/tool tests, and I have an automated loop that addresses them. (And a bonus from that: I use the outputs to make tutorials to show what the tool can do).
slacktivism123 | 3 hours ago
That tracks.
So it's the Omarchy of Adobe-like software?
theseamusjames | 3 hours ago
MisterMunchkin | 3 hours ago
Oh the times we live in.
forgotpwd16 | 3 hours ago
TnS-hun | 3 hours ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49958850
freeone3000 | 3 hours ago
therein | 3 hours ago
petterroea | 3 hours ago
Clearly the old "nobody would re-implement this" protection no longer works. I think we may stand on the brink of software losing a lot of it's magical DMCA protections, because it no longer matters. Or worse, the law becomes stricter.
ghostly_s | 3 hours ago
lioeters | 3 hours ago
nzoschke | 3 hours ago
I’m putting personal attention and tokens towards replacing Pioneer / Alpha Theta Rekordbox (music management for DJs).
The software is old and clunky, has a ton of features I don’t use, and can’t customize what I do use. And it’s enshittified with ads and popups and an expensive monthly subscription.
One big motivation for me is that it is FUN to rebuilt it with a coding agent. I’m learning a ton and the custom tools actually work.
I know I’m not alone.
https://deadca7.com/
skygazer | 3 hours ago
dvh | 3 hours ago
jasomill | 3 hours ago
wg0 | 3 hours ago
Can't understand what's happening.
PS: Anyone badmouthing the above rewrite is not understanding what's happening. Check back a year later for featur parity.
Seattle3503 | 3 hours ago
professoretc | 2 hours ago
arecurrence | 3 hours ago
dinkleberg | 2 hours ago
spottedmarley | an hour ago
1: Create new document from image data on the clipboard
2: Custom grid options (set width AND height of grid cells, offsets, etc)
I stopped using PS a while ago when it stopped working well under Wine. Getting to know Photoshop again after so many years is really fun
truetraveller | 23 minutes ago