Thank you! Australia is very fast -- they have a decentralized system of institutional and private ethics committees to approve trials, rather than the regulator deciding centrally, though the regulator retains the right to halt any trial at any time. They also have a generous tax credit for startups doing R&D there.
I've written about the Australian clinical trial system and the reforms I think India needs to accelerate our slow and archaic framework twice recently:
Open source software is still copyrighted, its just that the rights holders grant you a license that allows you to do certain things as long as you stick to certain conditions
"Once the Phase I trial of PVX-001 concludes, we will open-source the design and manufacturing information needed for others to produce and build on it, and we will not enforce our intellectual property rights against anyone who uses it to make vaccines against any betacoronavirus [...]"
The headline seems slightly inaccurate. A pledge of later going open-source isn't the same as open-source. Sure, "marketing".
They kind of did the opposite. Started off open source until they had gotten what they needed from the goodwill of the open source community, then made it closed source to make sure they wouldn't have to return any of that goodwill
I'm the founder of PopVax -- here's some context on this vaccine:
PVX-001 is a broadly-protective COVID-19 vaccine candidate intended to protect against new variants of SARS-CoV-2 even as the virus mutates. It is built on our RNA-encoded virus-like particle (VLP) architecture to elicit a broad & potent immune response.
Our lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulation, based on our own novel ionizable lipid PVXL-150, keeps the vaccine stable at 2-8 °C, regular refrigerator temperatures, for at least 9 months, rather than the -20 or -80 °C required by the first-generation mRNA vaccines approved for COVID-19. This will make it far easier to distribute the vaccine in developing countries.
The vaccine was largely funded by Vitalik Buterin's scientific investment fund Balvi -- in collaboration with them, we've made a commitment to making this vaccine open-source. Once the Phase I trial of PVX-001 concludes, we will open-source the design and manufacturing information needed for others to produce and build on it, and we will not enforce our intellectual property rights against anyone who uses it to make vaccines against any betacoronavirus -- the viral genus that includes SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV.
We are doing this because SARS-CoV-2 and its close cousins remain a substantial pandemic risk. In just the past few decades, they have caused one major epidemic (SARS), one close call (MERS), and one global pandemic that killed millions. The designs developed after the original SARS outbreak gave the first generation of COVID-19 vaccines a crucial head start in 2020. We want humanity to have an even better head start next time: a broadly-protective, refrigerator-stable vaccine that any scientist, vaccine producer, or member of the public, located anywhere, can improve, adapt to their needs, and manufacture without having to worry about IP.
Am I wrong in saying that along with new peptides, mRNA tech has the potential to dramatically upend healthcare as we know it. What else can you do with it or is it just for vaccines you think?
I propose we continue making the vaccine available, keep updating it for the latest flu, make it broadly available to everyone. In the "rich west", we keep people getting inoculated, and our health care payments keep research on the vaccines continuing. Also we make it available free for people in the developing world, or almost free. Vaccination should basically be a universal human right. Bill Gates by himself was paying for a ton of vaccines and also convinced the US govt to fund some. Unfortunately vandals came into power in the US.
We kick the idiots out who are destroying the international systems at the behest of our idiocracy government in the us. See what they did to usaid. Also those same people love to complain about non-existent things, such as that vaccines are awful and hurt us (like Kennedy in the us).
lysace | 5 hours ago
sohamsankaran | 5 hours ago
I've written about the Australian clinical trial system and the reforms I think India needs to accelerate our slow and archaic framework twice recently:
1) https://www.infinitesunrise.com/p/we-must-accelerate-clinica...
2) https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/et-commentary/a...
ktallett | 5 hours ago
usrnm | 5 hours ago
hyperhello | 5 hours ago
usrnm | 5 hours ago
codeulike | 49 minutes ago
lysace | 4 hours ago
"Once the Phase I trial of PVX-001 concludes, we will open-source the design and manufacturing information needed for others to produce and build on it, and we will not enforce our intellectual property rights against anyone who uses it to make vaccines against any betacoronavirus [...]"
The headline seems slightly inaccurate. A pledge of later going open-source isn't the same as open-source. Sure, "marketing".
arcanemachiner | 4 hours ago
emdash | 3 hours ago
arcanemachiner | an hour ago
sohamsankaran | 5 hours ago
PVX-001 is a broadly-protective COVID-19 vaccine candidate intended to protect against new variants of SARS-CoV-2 even as the virus mutates. It is built on our RNA-encoded virus-like particle (VLP) architecture to elicit a broad & potent immune response.
Our lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulation, based on our own novel ionizable lipid PVXL-150, keeps the vaccine stable at 2-8 °C, regular refrigerator temperatures, for at least 9 months, rather than the -20 or -80 °C required by the first-generation mRNA vaccines approved for COVID-19. This will make it far easier to distribute the vaccine in developing countries.
The vaccine was largely funded by Vitalik Buterin's scientific investment fund Balvi -- in collaboration with them, we've made a commitment to making this vaccine open-source. Once the Phase I trial of PVX-001 concludes, we will open-source the design and manufacturing information needed for others to produce and build on it, and we will not enforce our intellectual property rights against anyone who uses it to make vaccines against any betacoronavirus -- the viral genus that includes SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV.
We are doing this because SARS-CoV-2 and its close cousins remain a substantial pandemic risk. In just the past few decades, they have caused one major epidemic (SARS), one close call (MERS), and one global pandemic that killed millions. The designs developed after the original SARS outbreak gave the first generation of COVID-19 vaccines a crucial head start in 2020. We want humanity to have an even better head start next time: a broadly-protective, refrigerator-stable vaccine that any scientist, vaccine producer, or member of the public, located anywhere, can improve, adapt to their needs, and manufacture without having to worry about IP.
NDlurker | 5 hours ago
redanddead | 5 hours ago
Am I wrong in saying that along with new peptides, mRNA tech has the potential to dramatically upend healthcare as we know it. What else can you do with it or is it just for vaccines you think?
ampdepolymerase | 4 hours ago
Reubend | 4 hours ago
devin | 53 minutes ago
ck2 | 5 hours ago
every month, even in 2026
remember that when you hear 6 deaths from measles in all of 2026
both preventable tragedies
and millions suffering long-covid maybe for remainder of miserable lives
bethekidyouwant | 52 minutes ago
devin | 49 minutes ago
Alive-in-2025 | 32 minutes ago
We kick the idiots out who are destroying the international systems at the behest of our idiocracy government in the us. See what they did to usaid. Also those same people love to complain about non-existent things, such as that vaccines are awful and hurt us (like Kennedy in the us).
sportsracersss | 4 hours ago