A 20-year-long permanent cookie: America.gov and tracking

pluc | 6 hours ago

Never accept cookies from strangers.

Dwedit | 5 hours ago

I mean 20 year cookies make sense for a logon cookie, but not something given out to guests.

JSR_FDED | 5 hours ago

The “SI” apparently disagrees

verandaguy | 5 hours ago

Why do they make sense as logon cookies?

EGreg | 5 hours ago

Why not?

lokar | 5 hours ago

The burden is to justify it.

What technical reason is there?

bsoqk | 5 hours ago

How long should a cookie you expect to last forever actually last?

pixelatedindex | 5 hours ago

Why should it last forever?

bsoqk | 5 hours ago

Because when you log in you don’t want to be logged out at (what, for you, will appear to be) a random time of the future.

verandaguy | 4 hours ago

The solution here is a "keep me logged in for 30 days" or "remember me for 7 days" label on the checkbox, not a forever cookie.

bsoqk | 4 hours ago

That’s a solution for a problem that doesn’t exist. Nobody considers not getting logged out randomly a problem.

pixelatedindex | 4 hours ago

You said:

> Because when you log in you don’t want to be logged out at (what, for you, will appear to be) a random time of the future.

> That’s a solution for a problem that doesn’t exist. Nobody considers not getting logged out randomly a problem.

Isn’t this contradictory? The double negatives are really throwing me for a loop. Regardless, it’s extremely common for you to be force-logged out of a session for any portal that has sensitive info.

You’re never logged into your bank forever, SSO logins expire. The ones that don’t expire are stuff like YouTube or Netflix, but only if you use it (length of refresh token validity). Checkbox for keeping a session valid is a legitimate solution and I’m grateful it exists. Why do you say it’s a problem that doesn’t exist, when you yourself said it does?

I do not understand your thesis.

verandaguy | 4 hours ago

Just because it's not considered a problem by people without a technical or security background doesn't mean it isn't one.

We make many UX compromises in the name of security, and this is a place where that is most visible.

lokar | 4 hours ago

You think login.gov (Medicare, social security, tsa, irs, etc) should leave people logged in forever?

verandaguy | 5 hours ago

Because in most security models, access is often time-limited.

30 days, for example, is quite long, though NIST does identify 30 days as being the maximum recommended auth token lifetime for low-risk environments.

Higher-risk environments come with 24-hour and 15-minute lifetimes, for context.

ape4 | 5 hours ago

Of course, America.gov uses "SI". From its FAQ: America.gov uses SI to find and explain information from official government sources. SI can make mistakes, so check the sources included with each answer before making an important decision. To report a problem, select the feedback button below the answer and describe what was incorrect or out of date.

actionfromafar | 5 hours ago

Shit Intelligence?

wholinator2 | 5 hours ago

Supreme Idiocy, Superego Incinerator, Still Incomplete...

VCFundedGenYer | 5 hours ago

Sports Illustrated often makes mistakes.

treetalker | 4 hours ago

Saffron Impersonator

neuronexmachina | 4 hours ago

Slop Induction

kajman | 4 hours ago

This should be updated. It appears they've removed the regex triggered easter eggs, and it's well known that a Super Intelligence system is a combination of off the shelf LLM and hand written regex cases.

Or hand-prompted, more likely.

ukusormus | 5 hours ago

Most browsers cap cookies' max lifetime to 400 days or less these days

bsoqk | 5 hours ago

If this is the worst thing they’ve found in that portal…

integrallis | 4 hours ago

This is nothing but an attempt to disenfranchise minorities and people living paycheck-to-paycheck that can afford the time to deal with yet another ID... this is an old technique, just like gerrymandering, poll intimidations, and the all the tactics republicans have been using for years.

klaff | 4 hours ago

Who is writing these executive orders?