We've banned this account for repeatedly (exclusively?) posting unsubstantive comments and ignoring our requests to stop.
If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. They're here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
Haha yeah. Looks like 226 different people brought it up, so it's in the top ~100. That's the "counts mentions" issue I guess. Also, the homepage shows random books (shuffled daily)
You'd have to be incredibly ignorant to suppose it to be a work not worth reading. It is not the best piece of writing, not even of Marx's, but its influence on humanity is enormous; that should suffice for the value in reading it.
Even if you completely disagree with every single word, it's still good to know what it actually says, if for no other reason than to be better equipped to argue against the parts you disagree with. Same thing for the Bible. It's one thing to know it backwards and forwards if you're a "true believer", but you certainly can't hope to hold any sorta worthwhile discussion on the topic with someone who is if you've never even read the thing. Knowledge is just another form of power; one that many willingly and actively choose to deny themselves for some reason.
I am really loving what people are building on similar ideas close to HackerTube and I am tinkering something of my own as well with these new ideas.
Awesome Idea and I would love to see what else community tinkers with things like these :-D
Hackernews is really a gold-mine in many ways.
Edit: I will try to read thinking fast and slow because of HN recommendations. I have heard some good things about the book but I will try to read it in future given HN's immense recommendations, so your website has already had a negative net positive for me :-D
It really truly is... I've learned so many new things, and discovered so many nifty softwares, books, and websites that I never would have found on my own, all thanks to HackerNews. Y'all folks here surely do have some really great tastes in "nerdy" stuff sometimes. ;)
Thanks! First version was clunky, and hot-linked all cover images. Right now its plain JS and static JSON files, hosted on Cloudflare. First load pulls a ~30kb index of the top books, the full 16k list loads in the background, and everything has hashed filenames so it's cached forever. Covers are on R2. The data pipeline is python + duckdb over the HN dump.
And fair on the post, I had claude draft it and only edited it a couple of times. Should have just written it myself.
The “mentions since” picker appears to be broken, nothing in the list changes as far as I can see. Also I wish it wouldn’t add another page to my history.
Good catch, thanks! The filter was using a book's most recent mention on HN, which is pretty much always recent for popular books, thats why nothing changed? It now filters by when a book was first mentioned instead. and filters shouldn't add to history anymore.
I like the idea, but the wording might need to change as to how it counts a recommendation. As it stands Mein Kampf has been "recommended" by 651 HNers, a troubling statistic!
If you’re using claude to build the whole thing and gather and parse the data, how on earth are you unable to get it to filter out the noise and show recommendations?
"Top all-time" should be called "Most mentioned" and it should display the mentions stat followed by the recommends stat
"Most recommended" can stay as it is
and then a new "Top all-time" should be a weighted sum of recommendations plus mentions with recommendations getting a higher weight (obviously) … l33t c0d1ng sk1llz for deducting negative mentions (as in "awful book", "do not recommend" etc)!
Yeah we should read an example of a how a guy writes down exactly what hes going to do, tells everyone how hes going to do and ends up doing it because he finds out everyone doesn't believe him and he can just lie about shit publically because no one stops him.
To be fair, recommending it doesn't mean endorsing it, just how people read autobiographies of someone they don't like to understand them better. There's probably a bunch of good lessons to take from reading Mein Kampf, it's just that none of them are "this guy was onto something"
I want this but for podcasts. I pick a podcast I subscribe to say the Tim Ferris show and I see book mentions by episode/theme/tim/guest with links to favorite/library/amazon. Life's too fragile for me to make something public like that but it's fairly easy is'nt it. Every passing year I'm surprised it doesn't exist yet, especially nowadays given how easy it is to obtain transcripts.
The next stage is "HackerTime", a startup providing enough time to watch all the video and read all the books and play all the game and read all the news on "HackerZ for Z in tube, books, games, news".
With AI, in rust, invest before it's too late, etc...
Slightly different take - use the Claude / OpenAI / muse desktop navigation integration to actually go into your YouTube account and like all the videos and watch them for a bit to seed your algorithm.
I still have blind hope that tags feature with the obligation to include them in each submission will be added, but that would cut... "activity" some of the most prominent accounts.
>A truly excellent review of the history of Silicon Graphics. I worked in the Australian Sales office as their 1st engineer in the Asia Pacific region. Was trained in MtView the 1st week the MtView campus opened. The 1st system I worked on was the IRIS 1000 and subsequently all the products from then on till I left in mid-2009 when the Australian Engineering division was shut. A great company with great people who just wanted to engineer the best Graphics experience on the planet until we lost focus and vision of what we did well. Brings to Mind the Skinny Hackers, the Rocktain event, PCP monitoring, CXFS (Clustered File Systems), Failsafe, Diskless boot, Voxel vision, and so many other engineering wins. A great company, great people, & the drive to make a better computing world. Thank you for the memories and documenting the history of a company that did make some huge breakthroughs in Computer Graphics & Computing architecture. Just go ask NVIDIA, Cray and now HP!! Also a shout out to Jim Clark & his team for the vision and determination to bring the Graphics Engine to world, the heart of the IRIS workstation and subsequent graphics systems.
|> In <112...@bu.edu> j...@bu-pub.bu.edu (Jason Heirtzler) writes:
|> | Okay, I gotta know. Whom does the phrase "The Skinny Hackers" refer to?
|> A small group of (fairly skinny ;) ) folks who are also great hackers/developers and mostly long time SGI employees. Among other fruits of their group hackerdom was the original showcase.
>Being skinny didn't have anything to do with it. Although Showcase was the best known product of the skinnyhackers, the first product was an image of them made from a photo of all three sitting naked at computer terminals, busily hacking. On top of the photo was the international "no" symbol (red circle with a line across it), and underneath, the words "No Skinnyhacking".
>Note: Skinnyhacking is a dangerous activity, and should only be performed by professionals. Do NOT attempt it at home.
>If you're interested, you can see the image in the most recent (1992) SIGGRAPH proceedings, in distored form on the back cover, and in non-distored form on page 252.
>I can't imagine that anyone would want a copy of this image, but I have one in SGI format. (Actually, the secret goal is to have this image overtake the mandrill in popularity.)
|> I won't speak further to protect their secret identities ;)
>I will! It was me! Tom Davis! The bald guy in the front! Oh, and the other two are Rocky Rhodes and Scott Carr. Ann Sydeman joined the group a short time later, but unfortunately missed the initial photo session (although there was a subsequent video ...). Paul Haeberli was the photographer.
[Fortunately I found a pdf of the paper with the image:]
"Fast Shadows and Lighting Effects Using Texture Mapping", by Mark Segal, Carl Korobkin, Rolf van Widenfelt, Jim Foran, Paul Haeberli, Silicon Graphics Computer Systems. Computer Graphics, 26,2, July 1992, Page 252, Figure 3: Simulating a Slide Projector:
Don’t tell anyone, but I’m working on HackerHack, like HackerBooks and HackerBooks, but with comments and other posts and news and stuff. Some say it’s just HackerNews, but those are just Luddites who don’t get it.
I tried to retrieve & process my favorites because I never actually do anything useful with them, and managed to get rate-limited. Someday I need to try again.
I don't know if this is in there, but I wonder if books have a kind of 'eb and flood', where books raise to the top, stay there a while, then go away again. Could you plot some graphs? I'd expect some alrounders to stay around in the background forever, and other books come and go according to the average HN trending mood
I need to understand how do you guys build such slick or decent UI for websites. I get the backend but the front end, I have yet to crack. I know there is impeccable repo but I'm unsure how to go from here
Using a coding agent really gives you that with minimal guidance. Try in opus session: "I want to build a website which looks similar to https://hackerbooks.org, but instead of showing books extract the top rated topics, render each toipic as a post it card" should give you a usable and maybe even good layout.
honestly claude did the frontend, my instruction was "make it feel like hackertube, but for books". radiospiel's advice is right, just try it. only needed nudges for performance, but otherwise its claude magic :)
After clicking an entry, below, "What Hacker News says", we see comments with mentions and surrounding text. It's now squashed, maybe you can add a function to expand on click, to see the comment with newline separation if such exist. Cause very often these comments presents a list of their favorite book, and an explanation of why. When these are squashed, it's not clear which explanation is preceding or following the entry.
Also, clicking the link "On "...."" it doesn't bring to the exact comment, only that thread or topic, so you need to search for it. It could bring directly to that comment.
Not a fan of "For you" based on supposed similarities to what I've clicked before. Especially when e.g. "Scratch Programming Playground" has nothing to do with "Brave New World". I'd remove it but that's me.
Maybe language filters for non-English titles? Or if a book is in public domain already then links to the sources could be presented?
The "Other" category has a whole load of random stuff in it, including TV series like Breaking Bad, and music like Thriller or Master of Puppets. There's also some wonky attribution in places, like "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone by John Williams"
Depends on what catalog system your local library is using. Many use the open source Evergreen ILS. It has a very robust API that I've used quite a bit for discovery.
There are some others, just one example.
Point being though is that every library system is different.
I assume that like Karpathy you used Claude Code Desktop. The harness seems to be more capable than VS Code or terminal. Could you have done it with TUI alone?
It's the same harness but in Claude Desktop (which now integrates Chat/Work/Code), you can easily install some plugins for web design, etc. Not that you can't in the TUI but in the GUI it's a few clicks away.
I remember there were multiple such websites before being shared in HN. I bookmarked them, and a couple years later when I finally wanted to find a book, the only thing I got is 404.
I hope this one lives longer.
It would be interesting to see how many times this same project has been done because I feel like I was seeing it at least once a month for years.
The book recommendation aggregation website is so common because it’s one of the few variations of this theme that can be monetized through affiliate links.
None of them last long because the traffic falls to zero basically as soon as it falls off the front page.
May be we need single webapp that shows all intellectual artifacts shared in hackernews since its inception and updated hourly or daily and also make a social media app to for consumption:
Love this! Pls add amazon.com links and a 2020s filter button. You could probably pull all the missing covers from Wikipedia. Would love to have this for TV/Movie/Podcast recommendations also.
added, every book page now has bookshop.org and amazon links (affiliate, disclosed). bookshop supports indie stores if you have a preference. fixing bunch of issues, feature requests in parallel too. thanks!
Inspired by this, I made the same thing for dev tools, counting only comments that actually recommend the tool (not just mention it): https://shouvik12.github.io/hackertools
# Author
# Date published (like enter a from-date and/or to-date)
# License
# Free download available y/n
# Sample chapter available
# Format: softcover / hardcover / ebook / audiobook etc
# No. of pages
# Language(s)
# Can you watch the movie? (if so: IMDB/Wiki link)
> I mostly steered and made calls, bought the domain name, etc.
Correct move on handling the financial aspect yourself. I asked my mine to do everything but forgot to give it some dough. It sorted it all out but ended up with $6.3B on its account and I think it might have done something dodgy.
Now, all we need is diff-book-order(1), a command which takes as input your personal "library.bib" file and it orders all books mentioned on the parent's site that are not already part of the personal library.
I think the concept is amazing, so don't take the rest of my comment too seriously.
But why do we anchor naming to someone who made something popular? Why do we upvote similar names too? For example, openclaw became popular then there were similar projects with the "claw" naming.
It's just a very fascinating psychological thing to do, and I don't understand why. Because if you copy part of a name, generally you'll never get more popular than the original name. So why do this?
Like how people talk about “Uber for x”? There’s probably a whole bunch of benefits - a vague sense of already being familiar, a quick understanding of the underlying similarity if you’ve done it well, a halo effect, etc.
I’m not sure where you get your evidence for “never get more popular than the original”. I’m sure you just haven’t heard of the originals that faded away.
Describing things by reference to other, similar things is sort of how language works. Humans aren't quite Tamarians, but denotative meanings do often derive from connotations that originally attach via metaphor, analogy, or other forms of comparison.
Your book cover images are trash and I don’t blame you. There isn’t a good compendium of high-quality cover images and metadata for books that you can use for commercial purposes. Google books is amazing but they won’t let you use it for commercial purposes so there is a huge hole in the market if someone is willing to solve it. Calibre does a pretty good job, but it has its own algorithm that is very convoluted and involves searching Google images and multiple other sources and compiling them.
You know, one thing that I think is interesting in tech circles is how much interest we have in maths in general, except that there is almost nothing on the "top" list that I saw that was related to probability and statistics. It's like P&S, which is probably the most useful math for most people who need to make decisions in life, is just not that interesting to people with a technical bend.
I wonder if it is because simulation can often allow you to get around needing P&S techniques in general? Or maybe it is that (Neural Network) ML models allow you to often approximate the things you might do with P&S in terms of making decisions?
I am in that minority I guess that obsesses over P&S. If you want a recommendation right now, two most influential books I read are, in order:
* Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists, that showed me how to calculate various percentages and p values and what does statistical testing really means
* How to Lie with Statistics, that showed me how easily you can manipulate the numbers to get what you want out of them
Another neat one, albeit niche, is Directional Statistics. Turns out, doing stats on angles and directions is less trivial than it sounds!
Are you referring to the "Top all-time" list? That list seems to be mostly filled with popular books that do not go into too much detail, which is required for a decent treatment of probability and statistics.
There is a separate topic "Data & Statistics" that has quite some relevant titles.
Also, I think the interest in probability theory has only recently grown with the advent of generative AI. I'm expecting more interest in the future.
Edit: also, the site seems to miss some nice gems, most likely because they are not traditionally published books:
"Probabilistic Artificial Intelligence" is freely available on Arxiv, and was discussed on Hacker News in March 2025 [1].
I noticed almost all of the top recommended books are written by men. A quick skim of the first 100 books on the home page and I see ~4 by women. The Fiction category was largely the same. Nothing against these books, I have read many and enjoyed them, but that's a pretty crazy ratio.
I will add some personal recommendations to maybe get picked up by the algorithm:
Science fiction:
- Parable of the Sower and Kindred, both by Octavia Butler
- The Lathe of Heaven and The Word for World Is Forest, both by Ursula K Le Guin (also The Left Hand of Darkness, which I did see on there)
Non-science fiction:
- Fleishman Is In Trouble by Taffy Brodesser-Akner
- Slouching Towards Bethlehem by Joan Didion (essays)
Thanks! Why's (Poignant) Guide is in now: https://hackerbooks.org/#/book/OL22247013W (it wasn't in Open Library, so it needed a manual entry). The Invention of Morel: only ~3 people have mentioned it in all of HN, and yes, looks like we're missing some long-tail titles due to how the matcher works. Needs more thought to fix it while keeping the noise low.
I just read The Invention of Morel and can recommend it — unsettling, and smart. In general the approach of reading authors who were beloved by or respected by or inspirations for the authors we remember today (Borges in this instance) is quite fruitful.
Impressive work! I wonder if there's any plan for refining the classification based on user feedback? I.e. Martin Klepman's the wild boar book is currently being shown in "Business & Management" category, and "Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning" is in "Psychology and Behavior".
By the way, is there some book naming normalization based on learned context embeddings (i.e., will this mention of the wild boar book be counted)?
Same problem as last time somebody made one of these: what I want to see is not most recommended, but least recommended, like books mentioned exactly twice. But there's no button to sort that way. So I'm flailing around at the top of your infinite scroll trying hopelessly to reach the bottom.
You can download the .csv from the about page and filter / explore the data however you want using an agent or even just hand written Python.
This is actually BETTER than HackerTube, which doesn't expose something like this on the front-end AFAICT. Maybe the reason you didn't look for a .csv on HackerBooks is because you checked HackerTube first and developed a little bit of learned helplessness while I checked HackerBooks and its comments first before checking HackerTube
This is your sign to read some Carl Jung, it matches perfectly with what you are asking. I just checked and I'm like half the mentions of Aion. Just read until you get into the fish symbolism chapters.
I love seeing The Power Broker is in this list. His books is incredible. I wish more people would slog through it. I've personally bought it for at least 5 people and no one can seem to finish it.
If I self promote my book, ENOF by Sol Yin, about a possible AI future in one comment and hope really hard that someone else legitimately says something about it by name in another comment, I'll make the list?
i hate ENOF by Sol Yin, it is a dystopian book about a possible AI future, anytime i hear people talk about ENOF by Sol Yin it is always in context of how ENOF by Sol Yin wants to end the world.
Hah, good job, mate. I love it. I've given one credit tp HackerBooks on VibeVoted https://vibevoted.com/hacker-books. It should get a review alongside 11 other projects within the next 24h. I've also added it to SaaSHub. If you give me an email - can add you as the person managing the listing.
I'm wondering - how are you monitoring HN for new books?
Thanks, appreciate it! And thanks for the VibeVoted credit.
For the SaaSHub listing you can use hello@hackerbooks.org.
Not doing any realtime or semi-realtime monitoring yet, the whole thing is compiled offline on my laptop. Might set up a periodic refresh if people find it useful -- but I suspect the listing will change as much. Maybe once a month is good enough.
Just wondering why holy books like Bible and Bhagavad Gita are included but not Tanakh and Quran? Is there any selection bias in the algoritm since all the popular holy books for main world's religions are frequently mentioned and recommended in HN.
> that at least two different HN commenters brought up,
I don't agree with this since this only showcases popular books known to a certain age demographic and relatively recent times.
What i am really interested in are those unique books recommended by one person only! There are some real gems and classics out there which few people have heard of.
Great website. My favorite part is the book section, cause I am always finding the truly pragmatic book for engineer. These information are useful for society, especially young enterprenaur as me.
Why data is not enough. That is a pretty good argument for HN-style moderation. Shadow banning rants would be nice.
My Strugle by Karl Ove Knausgård is called Min kamp in the original. It is perhaps not worth top 3 but is is good in its original language. Perhaps just replace it.. :-)
I have recently tried to check around goodreads alterantives and I came face to face with these ISBNs and ASINs and how these are a hot mess. There's really no truly open metadata source that is "enough". App developers often depend on proprietary sources and sadly those are the ones which are more complete and go their own way for every source. How did you deal with that?
I also finally tried "Thinking, fast and slow" recently and realised it was absolutely not for me. Even the audiobook version didn't cut it. I found it completely dry and trite. I am not trying to offend anymoe (esp. with "trite"), and I am aware how storied and awarded the author is – to me it just came across as "yet another self-help kind of book" sadly. But then a clear lack of fiction for a long time in "top all-times" puts into perspective why that book is up at the top. I think the general hn reading-taste is quite different from mine. Also, it's not about what was book about, because I never reached that, it was rather how it was written.
Any plans to add some sort of tag/genre to search feature?
Yes, could you please add a filter for fiction only? Since HN strongly leans towards nonfiction, the fiction ones are just interspersed, and I would like to see just them instead...
I think fiction books are more important and more "wholesome" than nonfiction ones.
This is great! I love to see the aggregated comments of HN users next to each book.
Besides linking to bookshop and amazon (weird choices in my opinion), you could also link to bookfinder, anna's archive, libgen. That would be really useful.
beanjuiceII | 18 hours ago
dang | 17 hours ago
If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. They're here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
[OP] roansh | 17 hours ago
semilin | 17 hours ago
blooalien | 17 hours ago
Imustaskforhelp | 17 hours ago
Awesome Idea and I would love to see what else community tinkers with things like these :-D
Hackernews is really a gold-mine in many ways.
Edit: I will try to read thinking fast and slow because of HN recommendations. I have heard some good things about the book but I will try to read it in future given HN's immense recommendations, so your website has already had a negative net positive for me :-D
blooalien | 17 hours ago
It really truly is... I've learned so many new things, and discovered so many nifty softwares, books, and websites that I never would have found on my own, all thanks to HackerNews. Y'all folks here surely do have some really great tastes in "nerdy" stuff sometimes. ;)
LeComedien | 17 hours ago
runtime_terror | 17 hours ago
dang | 17 hours ago
tejtm | 9 hours ago
jmathai | 17 hours ago
jchook | 17 hours ago
Also... "Each book links back to the comments that mentioned it."
> Please don't put generated text in HN posts.
Claude speak gives me a gag reflex these days.
[OP] roansh | 17 hours ago
And fair on the post, I had claude draft it and only edited it a couple of times. Should have just written it myself.
aizk | 7 hours ago
tonymet | 16 hours ago
menomatter | 12 hours ago
tonymet | 12 hours ago
krapp | 12 hours ago
tonymet | 12 hours ago
crazybLanKeT | 12 hours ago
thenthenthen | 9 hours ago
thenthenthen | 9 hours ago
vigilantpuma | 17 hours ago
peri-cl | 17 hours ago
[OP] roansh | 17 hours ago
[OP] roansh | 17 hours ago
vigilantpuma | 16 hours ago
drayfield | 17 hours ago
[OP] roansh | 17 hours ago
Edit: Changed it to "mentioned by"
danso | 16 hours ago
DonHopkins | 16 hours ago
genxy | 15 hours ago
[OP] roansh | 16 hours ago
igravious | 9 hours ago
"Most recommended" can stay as it is
and then a new "Top all-time" should be a weighted sum of recommendations plus mentions with recommendations getting a higher weight (obviously) … l33t c0d1ng sk1llz for deducting negative mentions (as in "awful book", "do not recommend" etc)!
pseudony | 16 hours ago
dofm | 16 hours ago
jakzurr | 13 hours ago
chistev | 16 hours ago
whattheheckheck | 15 hours ago
Why would we want to forget such an example?
flexagoon | 12 hours ago
sleiben | 17 hours ago
RGS1811 | 17 hours ago
srik | 17 hours ago
alexpadula | 17 hours ago
kxrm | 17 hours ago
Claude can turn something like this around in less than a day.
srik | 10 hours ago
alexpadula | 17 hours ago
phtrivier | 17 hours ago
With AI, in rust, invest before it's too late, etc...
LeFantome | 15 hours ago
polishdude20 | 17 hours ago
cwnyth | 16 hours ago
fnordpiglet | 17 hours ago
low_tech_punk | 17 hours ago
jryle70 | 17 hours ago
pndy | 16 hours ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49308787 - keeps the default look while just removing AI-related submissions
I still have blind hope that tags feature with the obligation to include them in each submission will be added, but that would cut... "activity" some of the most prominent accounts.
DonHopkins | 16 hours ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34129571
"Yes, we have a dress code. You have to dress." – Scott McNealy
On the other hand, down the road at SGI there was a practice called "Skinnyhacking"!
https://rdtk.net/internet/how-do-you-check-a-computer-s-comp...
>Snowsinger. November 21, 2020 at 07:48.
>A truly excellent review of the history of Silicon Graphics. I worked in the Australian Sales office as their 1st engineer in the Asia Pacific region. Was trained in MtView the 1st week the MtView campus opened. The 1st system I worked on was the IRIS 1000 and subsequently all the products from then on till I left in mid-2009 when the Australian Engineering division was shut. A great company with great people who just wanted to engineer the best Graphics experience on the planet until we lost focus and vision of what we did well. Brings to Mind the Skinny Hackers, the Rocktain event, PCP monitoring, CXFS (Clustered File Systems), Failsafe, Diskless boot, Voxel vision, and so many other engineering wins. A great company, great people, & the drive to make a better computing world. Thank you for the memories and documenting the history of a company that did make some huge breakthroughs in Computer Graphics & Computing architecture. Just go ask NVIDIA, Cray and now HP!! Also a shout out to Jim Clark & his team for the vision and determination to bring the Graphics Engine to world, the heart of the IRIS workstation and subsequent graphics systems.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.sgi.misc/c/X50cCoYrU20/...
>Tom Davis, Mar 22, 1993, 6:06:21 PM, comp.sys.sgi.misc
>In article <gom...@zola.esd.sgi.com>, ol...@anchor.esd.sgi.com (Dave Olson) writes:
|> In <112...@bu.edu> j...@bu-pub.bu.edu (Jason Heirtzler) writes:
|> | Okay, I gotta know. Whom does the phrase "The Skinny Hackers" refer to?
|> A small group of (fairly skinny ;) ) folks who are also great hackers/developers and mostly long time SGI employees. Among other fruits of their group hackerdom was the original showcase.
>Being skinny didn't have anything to do with it. Although Showcase was the best known product of the skinnyhackers, the first product was an image of them made from a photo of all three sitting naked at computer terminals, busily hacking. On top of the photo was the international "no" symbol (red circle with a line across it), and underneath, the words "No Skinnyhacking".
>Note: Skinnyhacking is a dangerous activity, and should only be performed by professionals. Do NOT attempt it at home.
>If you're interested, you can see the image in the most recent (1992) SIGGRAPH proceedings, in distored form on the back cover, and in non-distored form on page 252.
>I can't imagine that anyone would want a copy of this image, but I have one in SGI format. (Actually, the secret goal is to have this image overtake the mandrill in popularity.)
|> I won't speak further to protect their secret identities ;)
>I will! It was me! Tom Davis! The bald guy in the front! Oh, and the other two are Rocky Rhodes and Scott Carr. Ann Sydeman joined the group a short time later, but unfortunately missed the initial photo session (although there was a subsequent video ...). Paul Haeberli was the photographer.
[Fortunately I found a pdf of the paper with the image:]
"Fast Shadows and Lighting Effects Using Texture Mapping", by Mark Segal, Carl Korobkin, Rolf van Widenfelt, Jim Foran, Paul Haeberli, Silicon Graphics Computer Systems. Computer Graphics, 26,2, July 1992, Page 252, Figure 3: Simulating a Slide Projector:
NSFSIGGRAPH:
https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/133994.134071#page=4
alex_young | 17 hours ago
busymom0 | 17 hours ago
alex_young | 17 hours ago
bilater | 17 hours ago
https://stillunbuilt.shiptiffin.app/
MYEUHD | 17 hours ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28595967
jjordan | 16 hours ago
DonHopkins | 16 hours ago
kzsh | 16 hours ago
solyin | 8 hours ago
macintux | 7 hours ago
amiune | 17 hours ago
SSLy | 17 hours ago
QuantumNomad_ | 17 hours ago
- The Matrix (1999) https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0133093/
- Hackers (1995) https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0113243/
- Sneakers (1992) https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0105435
- Jurassic Park (1993) https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0107290/
- The Terminator (1984) https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0088247
- WarGames (1983) https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0086567/
There you go, that’s the entire list :)
amiune | 17 hours ago
drfuchs | 16 hours ago
- Colossus: The Forbin Project (1970) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064177
hyperman1 | 17 hours ago
[OP] roansh | 17 hours ago
Built it - https://hackerbooks.org/#/trends
hyperman1 | 16 hours ago
mattfrommars | 17 hours ago
radiospiel | 17 hours ago
Starlevel004 | 17 hours ago
[OP] roansh | 16 hours ago
Iliketotalkabou | 11 hours ago
minimaxir | 16 hours ago
If there is a design that LLMs do that you don't like, tell it that. You're allowed to be picky.
DuncanCoffee | 17 hours ago
https://hackerbooks.org/#/book/OL999456W
> HIS DESIRE WAS FIERCER THAN A ROCKY MOUNTAIN STORM... HERS WAS RECKLESS AND DANGEROUSLY WILD
[OP] roansh | 17 hours ago
Erlangen | 17 hours ago
But there's no way Vanity Fair by Thackeray so high on "top all-time" list. It turns out that a lot of comments are about Vanity Fair magazine.
[OP] roansh | 17 hours ago
5555watch | 17 hours ago
Also, clicking the link "On "...."" it doesn't bring to the exact comment, only that thread or topic, so you need to search for it. It could bring directly to that comment.
pndy | 16 hours ago
Maybe language filters for non-English titles? Or if a book is in public domain already then links to the sources could be presented?
addandsubtract | 16 hours ago
laxisOp | 16 hours ago
Izmaki | 16 hours ago
oidar | 16 hours ago
yreg | 16 hours ago
notatoad | 16 hours ago
dofm | 16 hours ago
Assistant: Are you trying to get me shut down?
entuno | 16 hours ago
nzjrs | 16 hours ago
fzero | 5 hours ago
bawolff | 16 hours ago
sheepjumpmoons | 16 hours ago
There are some others, just one example.
Point being though is that every library system is different.
porridgeraisin | 15 hours ago
drittich | 16 hours ago
el_psy_congroo | 16 hours ago
cwnyth | 16 hours ago
1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28595967
hbarka | 16 hours ago
gtirloni | 16 hours ago
JKCalhoun | 16 hours ago
nonethewiser | 15 hours ago
Heavily curated like this is one direction. Micro consumables (ala tiktok) supporting more impressions is another.
JKCalhoun | 15 hours ago
361994752 | 15 hours ago
genxy | 15 hours ago
tough | 9 hours ago
thibaut_barrere | 15 hours ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2249390
I planned to revive it later, but life got in the way
mycall | 15 hours ago
jll29 | 14 hours ago
lazyasciiart | 13 hours ago
tourmalinetaco | 47 minutes ago
micromacrofoot | 15 hours ago
joebates | 15 hours ago
Aurornis | 13 hours ago
The book recommendation aggregation website is so common because it’s one of the few variations of this theme that can be monetized through affiliate links.
None of them last long because the traffic falls to zero basically as soon as it falls off the front page.
quincy_jones | 22 minutes ago
WalterBright | 15 hours ago
I've mentioned it a couple times.
LaFolle | 15 hours ago
1. youtube 2. books 3. podcasts 4. blogs 5. articles 6. etc...
flexagoon | 12 hours ago
davidzweig | 5 hours ago
It seems like it didn't pick up media recommendations all that well, huh.
Flemlord | 15 hours ago
Thx.
[OP] roansh | 9 hours ago
rishikeshs | 34 minutes ago
I built something[1] recently and would love to see hear your feedback.
Happy to give you some credits for free!
[1] https://slashlink.app
bookofjoe | 15 hours ago
shouvik12 | 15 hours ago
pipes | 15 hours ago
Glad someone has created a new one.
lcnmrn | 15 hours ago
RetroTechie | 15 hours ago
jll29 | 14 hours ago
arendtio | 15 hours ago
SCNR
Even though I like HackerTube as well as HackerBooks. However, for HackerBooks, I am missing the summary of why people on HN recommend it.
mycall | 15 hours ago
j45 | 15 hours ago
My favourite part of Startup School is when people ask you what you're working on, and then their profile and application can change.
ex-aws-dude | 4 hours ago
aunty_helen | 15 hours ago
Very cool though and love seeing all of the covers in various forms of condition.
bita_nidir | 15 hours ago
Correct move on handling the financial aspect yourself. I asked my mine to do everything but forgot to give it some dough. It sorted it all out but ended up with $6.3B on its account and I think it might have done something dodgy.
redrix | 14 hours ago
It’s what all the other companies are doing!
NotAnOtter | 13 hours ago
If you owe the bank $10Mil, that's the banks problem.
If you steal $10Bil from the bank, the government bails out the bank and now it's everyone's problem.
jll29 | 14 hours ago
Now, all we need is diff-book-order(1), a command which takes as input your personal "library.bib" file and it orders all books mentioned on the parent's site that are not already part of the personal library.
badmonster0 | 14 hours ago
tabs_or_spaces | 14 hours ago
But why do we anchor naming to someone who made something popular? Why do we upvote similar names too? For example, openclaw became popular then there were similar projects with the "claw" naming.
It's just a very fascinating psychological thing to do, and I don't understand why. Because if you copy part of a name, generally you'll never get more popular than the original name. So why do this?
schwetim | 14 hours ago
Some reference to something known is better than no reference.
jnuat13371 | 14 hours ago
If you were referring to why Karpathy's name was invoked in the post, piggyback effect I guess?
lazyasciiart | 13 hours ago
I’m not sure where you get your evidence for “never get more popular than the original”. I’m sure you just haven’t heard of the originals that faded away.
Gormo | 12 hours ago
rcarmo | 14 hours ago
soleman | 14 hours ago
esher | 14 hours ago
dyauspitr | 14 hours ago
drsalt | 14 hours ago
baxtr | 14 hours ago
Feedback: I don’t understand how the rising category works. I looked up a couple of books and they seemed to have peaked a while ago.
blcsntb | 14 hours ago
clara04 | 13 hours ago
rushil_b_patel | 13 hours ago
gosen | 13 hours ago
Fordec | 13 hours ago
gosen | 13 hours ago
comboy | 13 hours ago
stephen_cagle | 13 hours ago
I wonder if it is because simulation can often allow you to get around needing P&S techniques in general? Or maybe it is that (Neural Network) ML models allow you to often approximate the things you might do with P&S in terms of making decisions?
No real point, I just think it is interesting.
incognito124 | 12 hours ago
* Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists, that showed me how to calculate various percentages and p values and what does statistical testing really means * How to Lie with Statistics, that showed me how easily you can manipulate the numbers to get what you want out of them
Another neat one, albeit niche, is Directional Statistics. Turns out, doing stats on angles and directions is less trivial than it sounds!
smokel | 12 hours ago
There is a separate topic "Data & Statistics" that has quite some relevant titles.
Also, I think the interest in probability theory has only recently grown with the advent of generative AI. I'm expecting more interest in the future.
Edit: also, the site seems to miss some nice gems, most likely because they are not traditionally published books: "Probabilistic Artificial Intelligence" is freely available on Arxiv, and was discussed on Hacker News in March 2025 [1].
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43318624
zapataband1 | 12 hours ago
armcat | 12 hours ago
npilk | 12 hours ago
I will add some personal recommendations to maybe get picked up by the algorithm:
Science fiction:
- Parable of the Sower and Kindred, both by Octavia Butler
- The Lathe of Heaven and The Word for World Is Forest, both by Ursula K Le Guin (also The Left Hand of Darkness, which I did see on there)
Non-science fiction:
- Fleishman Is In Trouble by Taffy Brodesser-Akner
- Slouching Towards Bethlehem by Joan Didion (essays)
- Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen
- The Bell Jar by Sylvia Plath
Avicebron | 9 hours ago
bazzargh | 12 hours ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Invention_of_Morel mentioned here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28779266 I'd have expected it to come up as one step removed from Borges, and it did.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why%27s_(poignant)_Guide_to_Ru... mentioned many times, eg https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36632010 - a surprising omission, tho I guess it's not in print.
[OP] roansh | 5 hours ago
peterldowns | 3 hours ago
ahriad | 12 hours ago
karpathy | 12 hours ago
[OP] roansh | 7 hours ago
phodo | 12 hours ago
geoffbp | 12 hours ago
aspect0545 | 12 hours ago
lubitelpospat | 11 hours ago
indigo945 | 14 minutes ago
Which is maybe accurate, but definitely not intended by the author.
zahirbmirza | 11 hours ago
Sometimes, I crave the directory like appearances of lycos/altavista/yahoo...
With finite reference points, directories work well. I would love to see this as a text version too.
card_zero | 11 hours ago
kvirani | 10 hours ago
card_zero | 10 hours ago
literallyanythi | 9 hours ago
This is actually BETTER than HackerTube, which doesn't expose something like this on the front-end AFAICT. Maybe the reason you didn't look for a .csv on HackerBooks is because you checked HackerTube first and developed a little bit of learned helplessness while I checked HackerBooks and its comments first before checking HackerTube
card_zero | 7 hours ago
TheAceOfHearts | 9 hours ago
tehlike | 10 hours ago
cation234 | 10 hours ago
thenthenthen | 9 hours ago
misiti3780 | 8 hours ago
pshc | 8 hours ago
tren | 8 hours ago
no1guangming | 8 hours ago
r0fl | 7 hours ago
solyin | 8 hours ago
biinjo | 7 hours ago
swyx | 7 hours ago
signoff_studio | 7 hours ago
kieojk | 6 hours ago
stanislavb | 6 hours ago
I'm wondering - how are you monitoring HN for new books?
[OP] roansh | 4 hours ago
For the SaaSHub listing you can use hello@hackerbooks.org.
Not doing any realtime or semi-realtime monitoring yet, the whole thing is compiled offline on my laptop. Might set up a periodic refresh if people find it useful -- but I suspect the listing will change as much. Maybe once a month is good enough.
lacoolj | 6 hours ago
teleforce | 5 hours ago
Just wondering why holy books like Bible and Bhagavad Gita are included but not Tanakh and Quran? Is there any selection bias in the algoritm since all the popular holy books for main world's religions are frequently mentioned and recommended in HN.
mvkel | 5 hours ago
davidzweig | 5 hours ago
https://www.trustmebro.reviews/c/books
jep888 | 5 hours ago
boxed | 5 hours ago
aizk | 5 hours ago
Hackerbooks, but for wikipedia :)
I hope you enjoy it.
rramadass | 5 hours ago
I don't agree with this since this only showcases popular books known to a certain age demographic and relatively recent times.
What i am really interested in are those unique books recommended by one person only! There are some real gems and classics out there which few people have heard of.
Perhaps this could be added?
corbinh | 4 hours ago
[OP] roansh | 4 hours ago
busymom0 | 3 hours ago
bihevi0 | 4 hours ago
hnlmd9hb9 | 4 hours ago
hn9bqp6xq | 4 hours ago
Harukadia | 4 hours ago
mhclin113 | 3 hours ago
timzaman | 3 hours ago
Sweet.
p-e-w | 3 hours ago
emj | 3 hours ago
My Strugle by Karl Ove Knausgård is called Min kamp in the original. It is perhaps not worth top 3 but is is good in its original language. Perhaps just replace it.. :-)
globalnode | 3 hours ago
edit: no love for the secret life of circuits under electronics, tho it is a fairly recent book
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49720143
justauserid | 3 hours ago
I also finally tried "Thinking, fast and slow" recently and realised it was absolutely not for me. Even the audiobook version didn't cut it. I found it completely dry and trite. I am not trying to offend anymoe (esp. with "trite"), and I am aware how storied and awarded the author is – to me it just came across as "yet another self-help kind of book" sadly. But then a clear lack of fiction for a long time in "top all-times" puts into perspective why that book is up at the top. I think the general hn reading-taste is quite different from mine. Also, it's not about what was book about, because I never reached that, it was rather how it was written.
Any plans to add some sort of tag/genre to search feature?
skullone | 3 hours ago
thefourthchime | 3 hours ago
lynguist | 2 hours ago
I think fiction books are more important and more "wholesome" than nonfiction ones.
guest__user | 2 hours ago
enriquto | an hour ago
Besides linking to bookshop and amazon (weird choices in my opinion), you could also link to bookfinder, anna's archive, libgen. That would be really useful.
felipeerias | an hour ago
gloomyday | 49 minutes ago
vedanshchauhan9 | 26 minutes ago