Taiwanese researchers found that a carbohydrate-binding protein (i.e. a legume lectin) from lablab beans effectively blocks the infections of influenza viruses and SARS-CoV-2.[60] Researchers from Finland and USA found that extracts from chewing gum manufactured from lablab bean seeds had broad-spectrum anti-viral properties, likely due to the binding action of Flt3 Receptor Interacting Lectin (FRIL) on viruses; the anti-viral effect was similar to that of purified FRIL
Hunh I always assumed it was just some kind of modified natural rubber but it’s literally plastic (PVAc, PIB) that release microplastics into the saliva.
Not all is, including the one mentioned in the article. There are many "natural" chewing gum brands, that use plant based gum. You can buy boxes Amazon, or usually find them in the candy aisle of higher end grocery stores. You're probably not going to find it in a gas station/convenient store.
Tangentially related, apparently xylitol gum can reduce cavity risk by killing off bacteria (which cannot digest but cannot differentiate xylitol from regular sugar) in the mouth.
Xylitol is really cool that way. The bacteria waste energy trying to convert it to a form they can use, but they just end up with at a dead end with xylitol-5-phosphate. Once they realize that they need to get rid of it, they convert it back to xylitol (so it can cross the membrane easier and probably to keep the phosphate). Of course, that means the xylitol is back to fool some other nearby bacteria into wasting its energy.
They end up wasting their energy on work that won't help them reproduce and needing to waste more energy getting rid of it.
Sounds interesting, indeed. Just dug up this review [1] that claims there were no adverse effects from any of the interventions, and that after 2.5 to 3 years of use, a fluoride toothpaste containing 10% xylitol may reduce caries by 13% when compared to a fluoride-only toothpaste.
I wonder how well bacteria will adapt long term in your mouth to Xylitol exposure through bubble gum based adminstration.
[1] Xylitol-containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD010743. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010743.pub2.
Couldnt find any (relatively recent) studies that looked at bacteria over multiple years, but some earlier ones (1&2), or shorter period ones(3), that touch on it (aswell as caries, as that is the prevalent subject)
Not just gut flora. High levels of circulating xylitol (and erythritol for that matter) have been shown in both mouse models and humans to be associated with increased platelet reactivity and elevated 3-year risk of major cardiovascular events.
But we're talking significant levels of xylitol/erythritol, such as from keto-friendly ice cream and drinks, not the modest levels from chewing gum, and the dental benefits are well established.
I swish xylitol crystal after each meal for five minutes and then spit out. I no longer have plague on my lower bottom teeth, a problem area for most people. I like the fresh minty feel afterward as well. Wish I had learn about this earlier.
It's already bad for your cardiovascular system. It's food as a mouth wash but don't swallow it, especially at the recommended doses of 3+ mouthwash per day with 3-5g each time
I started chewing mastic gum a few years ago as a jaw-shape maintenance measure. An encouragement for anyone who's curious about it: I like the taste and stiff texture of mastic more than normal gum these days.
it originated way earlier as a way to help people who have naturally small nasal passages. i guess both mewing and chewing help widen passages. The book breath goes into details but from the perspective of health and not looks. This has been known for like 100 years but mostly dentists payed attention to it.
The fact is mewing and chewing do make a measurable difference…over time. Tiktok promotes extremes as they get more views and the more extreme the more views in a cycle of escalation. This gave birth to sad boys who see the Toyota chivalre’s and think they need the same jawline. Similar sad nonsense has been going on for women too but that has unfortunately become all but normalized.
It's amazing how they normalized fillers to the point of being hideous and convinced themselves that that's a beautiful aesthetic. The consensus seeking hive mind at work.
The looksmaxxing thing is a real reason mastic gum as a jaw workout is promoted. Won't deny that.
My use of it comes from early 2010s era paleo-food community observations about hunter gatherers having less crowded jaws than agriculturalist and modern peoples, hypothesized to be due to both micronutrient intake and also eating tougher foods. Cramped jaws and facial structures lead to both malocclusion and also nasal breathing issues, and mouth breathing also reinforces those pathological facial changes. Granted, this stuff is from sources that I've heard wildly varying opinions on (Weston A Price; Mike Mew). Jaw and facial structure continues to change into adulthood. I needed extensive orthodontics in my youth and have struggled with sleep apnea in adulthood. This broad set of hypotheses made sense to me, and chewing mastic gum was the easiest way to get a full dose of "chew tougher food" in my life. I try to snack on raw carrots too.
Speaking to attractiveness, there's an uncomfortable photo of identical twins in one of the Weston Price books, one given orthodontic treatment that widened their facial structure and one was not. The one with the widened facial structure was more attractive. The difference wasn't gigantic, but it wasn't small either.
I'm just hear to commiserate with the only person I've come across online in decades mentioning Weston A Price and his book of dental studies, which no doubt dates us. (The side-by-side jaw images left an impression on me as well). I'm guessing you were also part of the Price to Nourishing Traditions cookbook pipeline? Everyone I knew had at least the cookbooks back in the day.
Highly recommended, at minimum for interesting historical look at various cultures with a pre-modern processed food diet. AFAIK the basic hypothesis about diet affecting face morphology holds up.
Chewing gum in Singapore is a bit like medical marijuana was in California.
Possession and use of chewing gum is legal. Importation for personal consumption is also legal. Selling and importing in commercial quantities are banned.
I mean some fetishes have science behind why they exist. For example, the part of the brain that process feet is located next to the area that processes genitals. At least, some are explainable. Some are not.
Natural selection had a say in female mammals leaking blood trails every month, which is, mildly said, fcking stupid. Natural selection does not create optimal beings, it creates stuff that, somehow, kinda, works.
If you have the time for it, I highly recommend the lecture series on behavioral evolution by Robert Sapolsky, it's on the Stanford YouTube channel.
It's stupid from a practical perspective but the energy required to build up the uterine lining and tear it down on a (basically-)monthly basis is much lower than its upkeep
Adding to my sibling comments: It also has been conquered in some sense of the word. There are effective vaccines for the 9 most problematic HPV types: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HPV_vaccine . It is worth getting, regardless of your gender.
Gardasil 9 seems to be the best available HPV vaccine. I guess the chewing gum is mainly intended for people who were already infected with some HPV strain before they got the vaccine, or where the vaccine didn't work (because it doesn't offer complete protection).
There's been a lot of failed attempts at therapeutic vaccines and the like, but nothing has proven effective. It seems that the virus is quite hard to detect and target in the skin.
That, plus a lack of urgency due to the effectiveness of preventative vaccines, leads to a lack of urgency on the issue.
Aren't all gum based basically plastic? Including natural ones? So chewing any gum is just going to fill your body with microplastics right? I wonder if the risk offset is worth it.
In 88% (36 out of 41) of patients with high-risk HPV, taking reishi + turkey tail mushrooms daily for 2 months cleared the virus, versus 5% clearance (1 out of 20) in the control group. I suspect that 88% clearance rate would be higher if they continued for longer than 2 months.
Sorry, but no. This does not pass the smell test in the slightest.
This is:
- A single author paper with no academic affiliations.
- A search on the internet for this author finds them also pitching essential oils and a wide variety of other "alternative medicine" on the Youtube/Podcast grifter circuit and not the sorts of alternative medicine anyone seriously thinks might have some merit.
- The address listed for his supposed place of practice appears to be a roadside "clini-spa" advertising beauty treatments.
- This could only get published in some low-impact journal that's solely about the purported benefits of mushrooms, even though if true this would be a pretty revolutionary finding that would be of interest to far bigger journals.
Can I prove it's fraud? No, especially since I'm not paying $25 to look at the paper details.
But unless this finding replicates from someone with credibility, I don't think this means much of anything and I certainly don't think you should be taking anything in this paper as a fact.
shevy-java | a day ago
stogot | a day ago
fernly | a day ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lablab --
Taiwanese researchers found that a carbohydrate-binding protein (i.e. a legume lectin) from lablab beans effectively blocks the infections of influenza viruses and SARS-CoV-2.[60] Researchers from Finland and USA found that extracts from chewing gum manufactured from lablab bean seeds had broad-spectrum anti-viral properties, likely due to the binding action of Flt3 Receptor Interacting Lectin (FRIL) on viruses; the anti-viral effect was similar to that of purified FRIL
jerbearito | a day ago
dyauspitr | a day ago
nomel | a day ago
wxw | a day ago
mdasen | a day ago
They end up wasting their energy on work that won't help them reproduce and needing to waste more energy getting rid of it.
MengerSponge | a day ago
wuschel | 21 hours ago
I wonder how well bacteria will adapt long term in your mouth to Xylitol exposure through bubble gum based adminstration.
[1] Xylitol-containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD010743. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010743.pub2.
morjom | 18 hours ago
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2758793/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1810656/
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3...
odyssey7 | 17 hours ago
danielheath | 16 hours ago
AlanYx | 15 hours ago
But we're talking significant levels of xylitol/erythritol, such as from keto-friendly ice cream and drinks, not the modest levels from chewing gum, and the dental benefits are well established.
GuB-42 | 13 hours ago
There is a hilarious Amazon review describing the effects of sugar-free gummy bears in rather graphic details.
https://old.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/1ktb95/most_helpful_...
I don't know if it is xylitol, but if not, it is another sugar alcohol, like sorbitol, maltitol, erythritol,... that have similar properties
1PlayerOne | 15 hours ago
spike021 | 22 hours ago
eurekin | 21 hours ago
toasty228 | 21 hours ago
morjom | 17 hours ago
Recommended amount is 5–10g per day (5 pieces of 100% xylitol gum, 36% is already effective), taken after meals.
m463 | 9 hours ago
not only xylitol, but sorbitol, mannitol and maltitol. Also related are lactose, fructose, and *saccharides.
the keyword is FODMAP, look up low-FODMAP diet.
maybe: https://www.med.unc.edu/medicine/gi/faculty-staff-website/wp...
VladVladikoff | a day ago
code_biologist | 22 hours ago
hkt | 22 hours ago
4gotunameagain | 22 hours ago
Outcome of chronic social media exposure.
rustystump | 21 hours ago
The fact is mewing and chewing do make a measurable difference…over time. Tiktok promotes extremes as they get more views and the more extreme the more views in a cycle of escalation. This gave birth to sad boys who see the Toyota chivalre’s and think they need the same jawline. Similar sad nonsense has been going on for women too but that has unfortunately become all but normalized.
kevin_thibedeau | 13 hours ago
It's amazing how they normalized fillers to the point of being hideous and convinced themselves that that's a beautiful aesthetic. The consensus seeking hive mind at work.
code_biologist | 19 hours ago
My use of it comes from early 2010s era paleo-food community observations about hunter gatherers having less crowded jaws than agriculturalist and modern peoples, hypothesized to be due to both micronutrient intake and also eating tougher foods. Cramped jaws and facial structures lead to both malocclusion and also nasal breathing issues, and mouth breathing also reinforces those pathological facial changes. Granted, this stuff is from sources that I've heard wildly varying opinions on (Weston A Price; Mike Mew). Jaw and facial structure continues to change into adulthood. I needed extensive orthodontics in my youth and have struggled with sleep apnea in adulthood. This broad set of hypotheses made sense to me, and chewing mastic gum was the easiest way to get a full dose of "chew tougher food" in my life. I try to snack on raw carrots too.
Speaking to attractiveness, there's an uncomfortable photo of identical twins in one of the Weston Price books, one given orthodontic treatment that widened their facial structure and one was not. The one with the widened facial structure was more attractive. The difference wasn't gigantic, but it wasn't small either.
taurusnoises | 18 hours ago
sriacha | 10 hours ago
Highly recommended, at minimum for interesting historical look at various cultures with a pre-modern processed food diet. AFAIK the basic hypothesis about diet affecting face morphology holds up.
eru | 19 hours ago
noisy_boy | a day ago
eru | 19 hours ago
Possession and use of chewing gum is legal. Importation for personal consumption is also legal. Selling and importing in commercial quantities are banned.
whazor | 17 hours ago
grokcodec | a day ago
fsckboy | a day ago
skylurk | 23 hours ago
rustystump | 21 hours ago
eru | 19 hours ago
fyltr | 17 hours ago
Benanov | 14 hours ago
kybishop | a day ago
jdw64 | 22 hours ago
cyberax | 22 hours ago
jdw64 | 22 hours ago
TZubiri | 22 hours ago
Perseids | 21 hours ago
cubefox | 18 hours ago
AlanYx | 12 hours ago
Only in high income countries. The 4-valent version is still the dominant version available worldwide.
cubefox | 10 hours ago
jobs_throwaway | 14 hours ago
That, plus a lack of urgency due to the effectiveness of preventative vaccines, leads to a lack of urgency on the issue.
kevin_thibedeau | 13 hours ago
colordrops | 20 hours ago
eru | 19 hours ago
colordrops | 10 hours ago
HN is pretty good normally, but it has its share of idiots too.
https://samueli.ucla.edu/bursting-your-bubble-chewing-gum-re...
simtel20 | 13 hours ago
colordrops | 10 hours ago
https://samueli.ucla.edu/bursting-your-bubble-chewing-gum-re...
This includes natural gum bases.
bamboozled | 19 hours ago
nixonaddiction | 14 hours ago
wnmurphy | 12 hours ago
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25271984/
In 88% (36 out of 41) of patients with high-risk HPV, taking reishi + turkey tail mushrooms daily for 2 months cleared the virus, versus 5% clearance (1 out of 20) in the control group. I suspect that 88% clearance rate would be higher if they continued for longer than 2 months.
volkl48 | 9 hours ago
This is:
- A single author paper with no academic affiliations.
- A search on the internet for this author finds them also pitching essential oils and a wide variety of other "alternative medicine" on the Youtube/Podcast grifter circuit and not the sorts of alternative medicine anyone seriously thinks might have some merit.
- The address listed for his supposed place of practice appears to be a roadside "clini-spa" advertising beauty treatments.
- This could only get published in some low-impact journal that's solely about the purported benefits of mushrooms, even though if true this would be a pretty revolutionary finding that would be of interest to far bigger journals.
Can I prove it's fraud? No, especially since I'm not paying $25 to look at the paper details.
But unless this finding replicates from someone with credibility, I don't think this means much of anything and I certainly don't think you should be taking anything in this paper as a fact.