Oh i never knew about JavelinPattern! This is very interesting, thanks!
There is an older version benchmarked here, but i can benchmark it again soon. It should be highly competitive, the earlier version had a few optimization bugs that made it quadratic.
I hope I am not the one one who cringed every time they went out of their way to claim that [0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2} was a date, as if 0000-00-00 was going to show up in a document. If I had more emotionally energy, I'd for sure put spaCy up against a document containing nonsensical 10 digit strings and see how many it thinks are the 0th of Niluary in the Nilth Century
sunshine | 14 hours ago
Have you thought about trying to add RE# to rebar? I'd be curious to see a performance comparison between it and JavelinPattern.
viega | 13 hours ago
They haven't updated it in a while, and probably partially because it's not apples-to-apples for many things, but they did do some work on it.
Here's there forked repo:
https://github.com/ieviev/rebar
It's fast.
[OP] iev | 13 hours ago
Oh i never knew about JavelinPattern! This is very interesting, thanks!
There is an older version benchmarked here, but i can benchmark it again soon. It should be highly competitive, the earlier version had a few optimization bugs that made it quadratic.
mdaniel | 5 hours ago
I hope I am not the one one who cringed every time they went out of their way to claim that
[0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2}was a date, as if 0000-00-00 was going to show up in a document. If I had more emotionally energy, I'd for sure put spaCy up against a document containing nonsensical 10 digit strings and see how many it thinks are the 0th of Niluary in the Nilth Century