‘AI’ is not a neutral tool. It is a tool of a society that has given up. By its developers’ own admission, ‘AI’ is meant to enable control of population that subverts, and overpowers, all existing political apparatuses, and which, by design, is meant to substitute people’s capacity to make their judgements. If anyone is deluded in their misplaced optimism, it’s the ‘AI’ users and promoters who think they can plug themselves into this massive thing and use it to their advantage, without being dominated by it, not us who recognise that ‘AI’ can (and must) be abolished. If we muster just a fraction of the faith that ‘AI’ boosters allocate to ‘AI’, and put this faith into a revolutionary project instead, that would be enough to change the world. We just need to convincingly argue for such a (re)allocation.
In short, working towards ‘AI’ abolition is working towards liberation. But what exactly do we mean by that?
Abolition as a political project is most famously associated with the abolition of slavery. The political project of abolition identifies an oppressive institution that it wants to eradicate (in this example, slavery); and importantly, also, the project of abolition suggests a positive worldview (in this example, a vision of the future where humans treat each other equally and do not dehumanize and enslave each other). Taking an abolitionist perspective is not (or at least not primarily) being against an oppressive institution; taking an abolitionist perspective is being in favour of a liberatory alternative to an oppressive institution.
Other abolitionist projects follow this logic, too: prison abolition works towards restorative justice as an alternative to the carceral system; police abolition works towards nonviolent public safety as an alternative to the police (and/or policing) state; family abolition words towards community care as an alternative to normatively imposed heteropatriarchal nuclear family structures.
As AI abolitionists, we place ourselves in the context of other liberatory struggles against oppressive institutions and in favor of humane alternatives. AI abolition works towards a revolution from the left as an alternative to global technofascism.
Many proponents of the abolitionist movements mentioned above – abolition of slavery, prisons, police, and family – come to the conclusion that their abolitionist project is not possible within a capitalist system. The same is true for AI abolition. We believe that the abolition of AI is only possible if it goes hand in hand with the abolition of capitalism.
At this point in the text, since, as the famous saying goes, “it is easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism” (Frederic Jameson), it is worth reminding ourselves that not only are alternatives imaginable; they are also feasible and realistic, as for the most of human history — for the absolutely longest time of our human existence on earth — we humans lived without slavery; lived without prisons; lived without police; lived in communities without cisheteropatriarchal norms; and lived without AI.
Whole books and articles have been written, and will be written, about “what exactly” AI is. While these discussions are interesting, they are also beyond the point for our abolitionist purpose here; arguing about competing definitions of AI is distracting our eyes from the actual prize: an urgently needed revolution from the left. The good news is that we do not need to go through all of the small print in order to start working towards that positive worldview. This is also reflective of reality: since “AI” means different things to different people, you are invited to join the struggle — no matter if you are fighting against…
What all of these definitions of AI have in common is that enormous harm is being done in the name of “AI”.
[here could be inserted the typical laundry list of: the planet, the data privacy, the enshittification, the resources, the acceleration of work, the inhumane working conditions for data labellers, the damage to education, the detrimental psychological effects on people, the gigantic natural resources consumed, the gigantic dual use notjustpotentialbutactualuse see warfare in Gaza and elsewhere, the makingpeopledependentonithencelessawareof the issues, etc.]
Of course, technology is never neutral. And we do not buy into singularity narratives into “AI” bringing human beings closer to God, or the Devil, or both. So, what makes AI not just “yet another technology, and why don’t you go abolish the telephone and the printer if you hate technology so much?”, is the enormous scale at which the term is being used to do harm in the name of some diffuse technooptimist future. The harm done in the name of AI is much, much, much larger than any of the supposed benefits brought about by AI. And do not fool yourself at this point (just like we do not want to fool you): it is not enough to try to figure out how to “mitigate the harms while exploiting the benefits”. We can see that all of the harms done in the name of AI are integral part of AI; and are integral parts of capitalism. As such, there is no ethical AI, and never will be; and there is no AI abolition under capitalism.
It is easy to feel overwhelmed by the magnitude of the issues. Feeling overwhelmed, however, is not the same as being paralyzed. Even when you feel overwhelmed, you still have the agency to act. We collected here a list of actions you can take, from the smallest to the most involved, sorted more or less by magnitude of efforts needed.
You can abolish AI in your own life. Starting today.
When we ask to abolish AI, we are not asking to abolish numbers. The models that be may peacefully continue to exist in hypergeometric space, as they have for time eternal, independently of our human dis/usage of them.
When we ask to abolish AI, we ask to abolish what has become (from a 2026 standpoint), over the last few years, a prevalent cultural practice whose most salient feat is its overwhelming uncritical adoption (which, as we explain below, is not a fluke, but willfully engineered into AI systems).
What people that praise “AI” for its possibilities “for the benefit of humanity” (solving the climate crisis, eradicating racism, curing cancer, and render the working class superfluous through automation) miss out on is a simple reality check of scales and proportions. All of the enticing future promises so far have largely failed to materialize — quite on the contrary, “AI” is often driving the opposite of what the salvation promise is claiming, i.e., fueling the climate crisis, exacerbating racialized violence, facilitating the mental and physical suffering and death of billions, and trapping enormous segments of the population in increasingly meaningless and agencyless work. And at the same time (here the scale comes in!), if we weigh every single human’s participation in the BigDumbRobotInc. equally, the overwhelming majority of us humans nowadays is using “AI” for one single purpose: to outsource our thinking.
You may feel disempowered to act “against” anything as big as the BigDumbRobot (as cultural practice). Speaking of AI abolition can feel liberating — but also daunting. You can, however, start today to abolish AI in your own life, and then let the waves ripple outwards towards the lives of other people. Here is an incomplete list of feasible steps to take, sorted more or less by magnitude of efforts needed.
Refuse to accept that comfort is the ultimate goal.
Accept discomfort. Lean into discomfort.
Gain back your real life.
Abolish AI.