Even if they are legally in the right, it still shows commendable guts by Nitter to take on a man who is not only the world's richest, but also someone who is deeply vindictive and willing to push the boundaries of the law. Bravo Nitter!
I wish people would do this to Nintendo next. Nintendo abuse C&Ds and lawfare in completely defensible fair use legal situations and walk all over the little guys.
Nintendo has absolutely destroyed people legally. Nitter seems to be counting on massive donations (employable in opposition to Nintendo) or an unlikely case (weak law involved? Not likely for Nintendo)
Nintendo has absolutely destroyed people legally. Nitter seems to be counting on massive donations (employable in opposition to Nintendo) or an unlikely case (weak law involved? Not likely for Nintendo)
Nitter have received legal threats from X Corporation, not from Nintendo
...What the fuck is $Nitter? I have nothing against projects accepting cryptocurrency donations, but why do they seem to have their own token? I'm confused.
creating your own token is very easy to do(as i understand) so I dont really see any problem with it, if it helps with donations. Also it can be just a meme, I dont think OS project of Nitter size is capable of scamming people.
are you positing that they are too small or too large for scamming? to be frank, i think scam operations can run the gamut of team sizes. not to say nitter is or isn’t, just that i don’t find that a particularly compelling piece of evidence
trigonella | 13 hours ago
Even if they are legally in the right, it still shows commendable guts by Nitter to take on a man who is not only the world's richest, but also someone who is deeply vindictive and willing to push the boundaries of the law. Bravo Nitter!
WilhelmVonWeiner | 13 hours ago
I wish people would do this to Nintendo next. Nintendo abuse C&Ds and lawfare in completely defensible fair use legal situations and walk all over the little guys.
benoliver999 | 13 hours ago
It's baffling with Nintendo. Taking down YouTube reviews aka free advertising
WilhelmVonWeiner | 7 hours ago
I would posit most Nintendo legal threats would not hold up in court if anyone threatened were in a financial position to defend themselves.
benoliver999 | an hour ago
Most legal threats altogether
Vaelatern | 8 hours ago
Nintendo has absolutely destroyed people legally. Nitter seems to be counting on massive donations (employable in opposition to Nintendo) or an unlikely case (weak law involved? Not likely for Nintendo)
davmac | 7 hours ago
Nitter have received legal threats from X Corporation, not from Nintendo
dzwdz | 12 hours ago
This is unrelated to the main story here, but I've noticed this in the diff:
...What the fuck is $Nitter? I have nothing against projects accepting cryptocurrency donations, but why do they seem to have their own token? I'm confused.
FedericoSchonborn | 11 hours ago
heh
retr0id | 11 hours ago
That's not a coincidence, it's associated with the "pump (dot) fun" platform, which is essentially a platform for gamified memecoin gambling.
[OP] olex | 12 hours ago
creating your own token is very easy to do(as i understand) so I dont really see any problem with it, if it helps with donations. Also it can be just a meme, I dont think OS project of Nitter size is capable of scamming people.
sloane | 4 hours ago
are you positing that they are too small or too large for scamming? to be frank, i think scam operations can run the gamut of team sizes. not to say nitter is or isn’t, just that i don’t find that a particularly compelling piece of evidence
JulianSildenLanglo | an hour ago
I'm not a fan of proxying nazi-content, but if it pisses off the nazis I guess it's fine.