True, but that's a way harder problem to solve. For me what was important was reducing the noise as much as possible as fast as possible consistently. Youtube algorithms has been pervasive enough that anything that moves the scale down even a little bit was worth the effort.
It's free on GitHub for anyone to build, use or fork. I've built it for myself, but going through App Store submissions took me 2x the time, hence the price.
This is great, but why start with Safari and not a cross platform browser? Is there something native here that can't be done otherwise or is it just personal preference?
There's plenty of AI blocking Chrome extensions already, however I prefer Safari for personal stuff (and hence YouTube too) and use Brave for Google-gated work related stuff.
I’ve found that the AI label doesn’t necessarily mean AI slop, it just means there’s a non zero amount of AI in the video. I want to avoid AI slop but not all videos that have an AI title screen or whatever.
For a creator posting a video, Google gives specific guidelines on whether to tag it as AI:
"Was AI used to generate or edit your content in any of the following ways?
- Makes a real person appear to say or do something they didn’t say or do
- Alters footage of a real event or place
- Generates a realistic-looking scene that didn’t actually occur
To follow YouTube’s policy, you’re required to tell us about your use of AI. This includes realistic sounds or visuals made or edited with AI. [View examples](https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/14328491)"
So oddly an intro graphic only has to be tagged as AI if it shows a real/realistic person, place, or event, but (per the examples page) apparently any AI-generated music counts.
Yep, it's super useless. The label is so general. Was AI used for one image in the 10 minute video? Is the voiceover AI? Is the entirety of it generated with AI? No way to know.
Agreed. I think instead of "AI or not", that something more nuanced is needed - perhaps a rating system inspired by the MPAA's (g, pg, pg-13 r, nc-17, x) that is used for movies.
Yeah, I make song remixes in the style of a particular video game and while the music is completely human written (by me), I'll often have AI generated or edit the "cover art" for me so people have something to look at/chuckle at.
These videos are still marked as AI, and fairly so; however I don't think that means people should want them hidden :-(
> however I don't think that means people should want them hidden :-(
Sorry but no, even if the music is great I don't want to hear it if the cover was AI generated, at this point I'd happily accept even a crudely drawn cover because it is human :)
What's the difference between me pasting a face over a body in GIMP manually and me prompting an LLM to make the same edit, faster, and better than I would by hand? They aren't particularly high-effort. The artwork isn't really the point, but I can't just upload a black video...
AI-generated anything sends a message of 'I do not care about quality'. You might feel that that's unfair, but it's the impression you're making on a large segment of your potential audience.
Google’s been pushing creators to use AI thumbnails more heavily since right around the EU deadline for labeling, presumably in the hopes of saturating the label so that everyone burns out and eats their slop quietly.
Yeah it's pretty meaningless to see the ai label below videos. Lots of obvious AI shorts and videos are unlabeled yet other videos are labeled as fully generated with AI when they are obviously not [1]
one problem is that algorithms(1) to detect AI generated content are surprisingly bad
like non-AI generated animated/cartoon content is much more likely to be mistakenly labeled as AI then some somewhat realistic "looking" but for a human still clearly AI slop content
some platforms (TickTock) seem to label anything as fully AI generated iff the metadata indicates certain tools like Adobe Illustrator are used, independent on how it was been used
---
(1): If that tool is "ask an AI" then its not surprising at all. It's content which AI tried to make look as realistic as possible, the same (and potentially similar) AI will see it as "as realistic as possible"...
My pet peeve is the AI generated voices. I absolutely love the cosmology-astrophysics-space stuff. And it can be any crap if it's correct enough and entertaining enough and passive enough that I can fall asleep to it.
But once I detect that the voiceover is AI generated that shit get instablocked forever. It's an instant put-off. Do all the visuals you want with AI as long as they are reasonable but when a human (AI) voice starts to fuck with the way a word has been presented in a particular context then it just makes me want to hate everything I won't mention any names <cough> elevenlabs.
Many content creators on YouTube may not have English as their first language, so they turn to AI to do the voice over. The thing is, I'd rather listen to broken English read by a human than an AI voice over. The AI voices are off putting and tiresome. It's somehow hurts my brain less trying to process a Chinese person speak bad English. Alternatively for something like YouTube, add subtitles and just speak your own language is much more comfortable than the AI voice-overs.
Depends. I take an AI generated voice over a french guy trying to talk english every day! Same for japanese. I really try, but I find these two speaker types really hard to follow and stay alert.
I think I'd prefer they speak their native language and add subtitles, but not AI generated ones, because the AI also can't understand a Frenchmen speaking English.
I find it interesting that you were perfectly happy with it, enjoying it even, but it was only at the point you noticed a minor word pronounced incorrectly that you flip to the extreme, hate it and want to block it to never see it again?
I’ve started calling this “AI Bipolar”, and I find it fascinating. It seems like people are offended that they were “duped” into enjoying AI generated content, but will continue on to the next lower-quality human-made content with all sorts of issues that they will completely forgive solely out of comfort that it is a human doing it.
My only concern is that I have seen legit videos by creators on the platform for many years, with the tiny "AI (i)" label below the video. I have seen this even on channels that are not faceless.
You would think if anyone could get this right, it would be Google/YouTube, but apparently not.
I have seen this even on channels that are not faceless.
The AI logo doesn't mean "entirely made with AI". It means "significant use of AI detected". If someone uses AI to modify the background of their video (say, to remove a detail) it'll get the label.
This is great. Having the option to choose whether or not to see AI content was the first thing I hoped they'd add a filter for when it was first introduced.
This is what they mean when they say AI amplifies inequality. If you're technically competent, you just write yourself an extension to block the slop spam, or at least pay to install one. So in the end it's rotting much more the brains of the least prepared.
This is great and hope it'll be compatible with more and more browsers.
This should be done by youtube themselves. It's so simple for them to label AI generated content so people can either look for it or avoid it but they won't do it. I'm not sure how they profit from AI gen videos over regular videos...
I was looking for a setting to turn off Youtube Shorts but there's no way to do it, it's like that by design, Youtube want to shove those in your face so you click on it, even if by accident. Luckily I found a free app to do it (IOS). I absolutely appreciate the effort people put into fighting these companies back.
> I was looking for a setting to turn off Youtube Shorts
I put out shortless [0] for the very same reason...I just hate them. This works only on Safari, but I stopped using the native app altogether a long time ago, so it wasn't that big of a jump for me :)
In the mobile app you can go to Settings > Time Management > Daily Limits > Shorts feed limit and set it to 0 minutes. It removes all shorts from your home feed.
If you click on a short, or the shorts tab you see "you reached your Shorts feed limit".
And if you click on the subcriptions tab theres only one section of shorts at the top and they don't show up again when you scroll down.
There are tons of human-generated videos on YouTube that aren't worth watching either, and usually can be identified by "screamer" thumbnails and vapid clickbaity titles. I don't think we need to amplify another divisive topic.
I go on YouTube to watch humans talking, nature and music videos and get an insane amount of AI reviews, AI videos, and AI songs. What I find weird is how they end up at the top. Are people actually watching them, which is why they’re ranked so high? Or is the YouTube algorithm just being exploited? Fortunately, there are keywords that still bring back humans, but it’s so annoying.
most of them include potty training dinosaurs or monsters which shows authentic positions of such beings taking a shit, and the spectators ends up covered in or being bombarded with literal shit balls...
And know what is worse is that kids appear to prefer this to Tom and Jerry!
Something I've noticed in a couple hobbies on youtube, is that the popular channels are not the ones that show up when I search. Like for cars, there ar 2 particular youtubers who show up all over search results, but amongst the car community you will never hear people talk about watching their videos.
Me and my inner circle do watch them (even my sister-in-law, unemployed, just started to tinker with)
Can't speak for them though but when I search smt I don't really care if it is the top youtuber in my country or a random model with fake pictures, I just want to watch it
YouTube needs a way to report mislabelled AI videos, and actually the "Made with AI" label is a bit misleading. I don't mind if it uses some AI, what I don't want is AI slop, and that can only really be reported by users.
Same with Instagram, they need a way to report AI.
I've just submitted it to AMO for review (in the meantime, you can load extension/ via about:debugging). Will update the repo with the store link once approved!
thatmf | 20 days ago
[OP] masteranza | 20 days ago
embedding-shape | 20 days ago
[OP] masteranza | 20 days ago
mikeweiss | 20 days ago
singpolyma3 | 20 days ago
[OP] masteranza | 20 days ago
ranger_danger | 20 days ago
I'm in the wrong business.
[OP] masteranza | 20 days ago
0x1d7 | 20 days ago
https://support.apple.com/guide/security/app-code-signing-pr...
lukeasch21 | 20 days ago
[OP] masteranza | 20 days ago
gregjw | 20 days ago
adav | 20 days ago
Schnitz | 20 days ago
tadfisher | 20 days ago
Muskwalker | 20 days ago
"Was AI used to generate or edit your content in any of the following ways?
- Makes a real person appear to say or do something they didn’t say or do
- Alters footage of a real event or place
- Generates a realistic-looking scene that didn’t actually occur
To follow YouTube’s policy, you’re required to tell us about your use of AI. This includes realistic sounds or visuals made or edited with AI. [View examples](https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/14328491)"
So oddly an intro graphic only has to be tagged as AI if it shows a real/realistic person, place, or event, but (per the examples page) apparently any AI-generated music counts.
[OP] masteranza | 20 days ago
f3408fh | 20 days ago
AmazingEveryDay | 20 days ago
arcfour | 20 days ago
These videos are still marked as AI, and fairly so; however I don't think that means people should want them hidden :-(
PixelForg | 20 days ago
Sorry but no, even if the music is great I don't want to hear it if the cover was AI generated, at this point I'd happily accept even a crudely drawn cover because it is human :)
arcfour | 20 days ago
Planktonne | 20 days ago
Schnitz | 19 days ago
altairprime | 20 days ago
conmod278 | 20 days ago
Oneiric | AI Sci-Fi Short Film | Higgsfield Originals (2026)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAg9iDh9_BQ
AI is replacing me by kold
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGoFUxCmBdA
mechazawa | 20 days ago
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3Pdf8iRw5E
dathinab | 20 days ago
like non-AI generated animated/cartoon content is much more likely to be mistakenly labeled as AI then some somewhat realistic "looking" but for a human still clearly AI slop content
some platforms (TickTock) seem to label anything as fully AI generated iff the metadata indicates certain tools like Adobe Illustrator are used, independent on how it was been used
---
(1): If that tool is "ask an AI" then its not surprising at all. It's content which AI tried to make look as realistic as possible, the same (and potentially similar) AI will see it as "as realistic as possible"...
ungreased0675 | 20 days ago
Suppafly | 20 days ago
karim79 | 20 days ago
But once I detect that the voiceover is AI generated that shit get instablocked forever. It's an instant put-off. Do all the visuals you want with AI as long as they are reasonable but when a human (AI) voice starts to fuck with the way a word has been presented in a particular context then it just makes me want to hate everything I won't mention any names <cough> elevenlabs.
mrweasel | 20 days ago
lynx97 | 20 days ago
mrweasel | 19 days ago
carlosjobim | 19 days ago
shoobiedoo | 20 days ago
therealpygon | 19 days ago
I’ve started calling this “AI Bipolar”, and I find it fascinating. It seems like people are offended that they were “duped” into enjoying AI generated content, but will continue on to the next lower-quality human-made content with all sorts of issues that they will completely forgive solely out of comfort that it is a human doing it.
consumer451 | 20 days ago
You would think if anyone could get this right, it would be Google/YouTube, but apparently not.
onion2k | 20 days ago
The AI logo doesn't mean "entirely made with AI". It means "significant use of AI detected". If someone uses AI to modify the background of their video (say, to remove a detail) it'll get the label.
MarioMan | 20 days ago
Just for kicks, I inverted the filter in a TamperMoneky script that only keeps the AI-generated content: https://gist.github.com/SMarioMan/32c959d79035cb421df1c69c06...
negura | 20 days ago
GaryBluto | 20 days ago
vivzkestrel | 20 days ago
- like how do you actually determine if a video was AI made or not?
- what is the algorithm used? what is the threshold for a video to be considered slop?
- what do you do? download the videos with yt-dlp split them into frames and run each frame by what?
ffsm8 | 20 days ago
> Weedout is a $1.99 Safari extension for macOS that removes videos YouTube labels “Made with AI”
So no, none of that. Blows my mind if someone pays for that
tartoran | 20 days ago
This should be done by youtube themselves. It's so simple for them to label AI generated content so people can either look for it or avoid it but they won't do it. I'm not sure how they profit from AI gen videos over regular videos...
I was looking for a setting to turn off Youtube Shorts but there's no way to do it, it's like that by design, Youtube want to shove those in your face so you click on it, even if by accident. Luckily I found a free app to do it (IOS). I absolutely appreciate the effort people put into fighting these companies back.
ultrarunner | 20 days ago
afavour | 20 days ago
tatoalo | 20 days ago
I put out shortless [0] for the very same reason...I just hate them. This works only on Safari, but I stopped using the native app altogether a long time ago, so it wasn't that big of a jump for me :)
[0]: https://shortless.app
NotErnie | 20 days ago
If you click on a short, or the shorts tab you see "you reached your Shorts feed limit".
And if you click on the subcriptions tab theres only one section of shorts at the top and they don't show up again when you scroll down.
ssernikk | 20 days ago
I agree! Just ported it to Firefox, see my other comment here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49533429
Definitely gonna use it myself.
Izkata | 19 days ago
There is a small "AI" tag that shows up below the title when viewing the video. Don't know if it's automatic or self-applied though.
userbinator | 20 days ago
Frannky | 20 days ago
Foobar8568 | 20 days ago
Basically 90% are just crap done by computers (pre AI), targeting preschoolers.
qsera | 20 days ago
And know what is worse is that kids appear to prefer this to Tom and Jerry!
zf00002 | 19 days ago
crefiz | 19 days ago
Can't speak for them though but when I search smt I don't really care if it is the top youtuber in my country or a random model with fake pictures, I just want to watch it
kenanfyi | 20 days ago
haul_up | 20 days ago
Tajnymag | 20 days ago
sshussain270 | 20 days ago
vist_orn | 20 days ago
flanked-evergl | 20 days ago
Same with Instagram, they need a way to report AI.
chukar | 20 days ago
ssernikk | 20 days ago
https://github.com/kacperwyczawski/herbisight (herbisight -> herbicide -> weeds, you know)
I've just submitted it to AMO for review (in the meantime, you can load extension/ via about:debugging). Will update the repo with the store link once approved!
vrganj | 20 days ago
mschuster91 | 20 days ago
EdZitron2 | 20 days ago
Look at gossipgoblin - you think that’s “just ai”?
malte87 | 19 days ago
DylanMerigaud | 19 days ago
elar_verole | 19 days ago