It's rare that I feel like LLM scent gradually increases throughout an article. I'm going to guess that the author started writing and just got tired at some point. Independent of the LLMness, it also has too much empty text and misses most of the interesting details. For example, it doesn't talk about how executing the plan avoids clobbering registers across different ABIs. It also doesn't seem to motivate why not simply jit, since the plan is already not portable.
orib | an hour ago
It's rare that I feel like LLM scent gradually increases throughout an article. I'm going to guess that the author started writing and just got tired at some point. Independent of the LLMness, it also has too much empty text and misses most of the interesting details. For example, it doesn't talk about how executing the plan avoids clobbering registers across different ABIs. It also doesn't seem to motivate why not simply jit, since the plan is already not portable.
The code is almost entirely Claude.
wrl | an hour ago
Felt the same way about the post. Went to the repo, saw all the work had the Claude co-authorship.
hailey | 13 minutes ago
Felt the same way. In particular:
What is the function of the word 'genuine' here? Which ABI doesn't have genuine rules? You can't just vibe your arguments into registers