Show HN: Claude Code vs. Codex Global Usage Leaderboard

11 points by optimizethis 9 hours ago on hackernews | 13 comments

SlavikCA | 8 hours ago

where that usage data coming from?

bethekidyouwant | 8 hours ago

You sign up with them and they track your usage. Why would anyone want to do this?

It’s slop all the way down.

dyauspitr | 8 hours ago

So it’s heavily self selecting and pointless.

lostmsu | 6 hours ago

If their tracking tool is open, why not?

Esophagus4 | 5 hours ago

It’s not really for individuals… check the use cases tab.

It’s for enterprise to see who’s using AI and track token usage / spend.

spiderfarmer | 8 hours ago

Great example of how AI can make something look decent, but when you're actually trying to grasp what it tries to communicate, you can really notice the lack of a human touch.

keeganpoppen | 8 hours ago

the human touch from human curation of the ai output, which tends to be sorely lacking.

bot403 | 8 hours ago

Not just a problem communicating but a lack of a problem here.

Why do I want to publish my team's ai usage with this random site? It's all risk and no upside.

codybontecou | 8 hours ago

Pay to publish your team's ai usage*

Esophagus4 | 5 hours ago

Especially when, if you’re an org that is heavy users of AI… you could just vibe code your own leaderboard and not have to pay monthly?

Presumably you will not be using this product long term, so why bother paying for something rather than just vibing a quick telemetry script and dashboard?

maxshadurskiy | 8 hours ago

Good to hear. We doing something similar at https://thrumlabs.com/ but with rewards and private leaderboards

hamid_wakili | 8 hours ago

i really would love to know where the data is coming from

bethekidyouwant | 8 hours ago

From you signing up and giving them your data