Show HN: Claude Code vs. Codex Global Usage Leaderboard

12 points by optimizethis 26 days ago on hackernews | 13 comments

SlavikCA | 26 days ago

where that usage data coming from?

bethekidyouwant | 26 days ago

You sign up with them and they track your usage. Why would anyone want to do this?

It’s slop all the way down.

dyauspitr | 26 days ago

So it’s heavily self selecting and pointless.

lostmsu | 26 days ago

If their tracking tool is open, why not?

Esophagus4 | 26 days ago

It’s not really for individuals… check the use cases tab.

It’s for enterprise to see who’s using AI and track token usage / spend.

spiderfarmer | 26 days ago

Great example of how AI can make something look decent, but when you're actually trying to grasp what it tries to communicate, you can really notice the lack of a human touch.

keeganpoppen | 26 days ago

the human touch from human curation of the ai output, which tends to be sorely lacking.

bot403 | 26 days ago

Not just a problem communicating but a lack of a problem here.

Why do I want to publish my team's ai usage with this random site? It's all risk and no upside.

codybontecou | 26 days ago

Pay to publish your team's ai usage*

Esophagus4 | 26 days ago

Especially when, if you’re an org that is heavy users of AI… you could just vibe code your own leaderboard and not have to pay monthly?

Presumably you will not be using this product long term, so why bother paying for something rather than just vibing a quick telemetry script and dashboard?

maxshadurskiy | 26 days ago

Good to hear. We doing something similar at https://thrumlabs.com/ but with rewards and private leaderboards

hamid_wakili | 26 days ago

i really would love to know where the data is coming from

bethekidyouwant | 26 days ago

From you signing up and giving them your data