The readme seems to say the answer is yes? You'll lose the disk-based cache, but it's not inherently unsafe because the only coordination is object storage.
I agree and nearly commented about that; it is very concerning & ought be at least in the README.
I was charitably thinking perhaps maybe possibly being a fork doesn't give you access to the full suite of GitHub tools: iirc issues aren't at least by default available? Maybe there's a setting for that.
It felt like a little too big a topic to tackle in my post, so I ommited, but I definitely have concerns! Very weird.
billconan | a day ago
CBLT | 5 hours ago
jauntywundrkind | 5 hours ago
This one appears to be a more active fork of Tobi's, https://github.com/tobi/walgit https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49420598
My comment listing 6 from 2 weeks ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49763869
wrsh07 | 3 hours ago
Attribution is not just a problem for LLMs in mathematics!
Tobi is where I first heard the concept: https://github.com/tobi/walgit
And he credits this Cursor post for giving him the ideas and says it's worth reading: https://cursor.com/blog/git-at-any-scale
Note: in related work, the East River Source Control team has posted about their vision for git as well: https://ersc.io/blog/what-comes-after-git
jauntywundrkind | 2 hours ago
I was charitably thinking perhaps maybe possibly being a fork doesn't give you access to the full suite of GitHub tools: iirc issues aren't at least by default available? Maybe there's a setting for that.
It felt like a little too big a topic to tackle in my post, so I ommited, but I definitely have concerns! Very weird.
uptownhr | 4 hours ago
And built https://agentgit.co with it.
Scales to 0
Imustaskforhelp | 3 hours ago
Does this make the git object storage part cache on cloudflare though or is it sent straight from the configured S3 bucket?
spankalee | an hour ago