This seems really interesting, thanks maxloh for sharing.
I have a quick question but https://aihubmix.com/model/coding-glm-5.1-free seems to be free in the chances of "coding-glm-5.1-free is the open and free version of coding-glm-5.1. To ensure stable service performance, usage limits are in place: up to 5 requests per minute, 500 requests per day, and a daily token allowance of 1 million."
Is there any catch aside from that for this aihubmix? I use opencode-zen from free version mostly if I want agents but this seems interesting to me as well and I think that it mught be able to get integrated into opencode itself as well given this repo is from opencode (well anomalyco)
A quick question but is there any tangible benefit of using these AIhubmix or others over something like opencode-zen itself that I may be missing?
Interesting approach. The unified pricing table is helpful, but I'd love to see latency benchmarks across providers – that's often the hidden cost beyond price/token.
Its interesting and pretty useful if it can be kept updated in long run. Also some way to capturing the changes in pricing if any given that one of the arguments is that over the time the prices should come down.
nit suggestion: It took a while to realize that I have to scroll to right to see more details. Most users are in habit of scrolling down or click on some button to see more details.
The future of sites like this (and by future I mean the present) is automated actions that infer what to do to keep the site up to date. Imagine a CI job with a single generic task of “keep things fresh”. Combined with some guard rails for deploying and validating, and you get a living site. It’ll figure out on its own to scrape HN for new sites that list models. Figure out their pricing pages.
> There's no single database with information about all the available AI models. We started Models.dev as a community-contributed project to address this.
There are literally dozens of existing projects that are doing what you are trying to do.
Good point. There isn't really a single database with information about all the availablle AI model databases. Someone should start a community-contributed project to address this!
The boilerplate really does get out of hand sometimes. “There isn’t X. We built X.” Really wish more folks would stick to the older “I couldn’t find X so I built it.”
At this point you have to use more than one to get a complete picture, which I’m doing now. Mainly because:
1) some are not always up to date (started on helicone but felt a lag on price updates)
2) they don’t return every model / provider I want (https://ai-gateway.vercel.sh/v1/models has rich data but is a subset, so I combine with helicone)
I always hope for the best when someone has a new list because of this. I want a de facto source!
This is missing data like when particular model was nerfed or how often provider routes to cheaper less capable model (variants of so called adaptive reasoning).
Cost per token says nothing. For instance if model goes dumb half way the task and you have to start again. If model does that all the time, then the cost is substantially higher than headline figure.
Probably such a service should constantly run various types of tasks on such models and gauge quality of output (though still provider can detect it and pin their best model to skew the results).
This needs filter by “current”. Most of models are superseded by newer versions that cost same or less, and there’s no reason to have old ones in the list when most of users want to evaluate the current market.
sixtyj | 22 hours ago
Imustaskforhelp | 22 hours ago
I have a quick question but https://aihubmix.com/model/coding-glm-5.1-free seems to be free in the chances of "coding-glm-5.1-free is the open and free version of coding-glm-5.1. To ensure stable service performance, usage limits are in place: up to 5 requests per minute, 500 requests per day, and a daily token allowance of 1 million."
Is there any catch aside from that for this aihubmix? I use opencode-zen from free version mostly if I want agents but this seems interesting to me as well and I think that it mught be able to get integrated into opencode itself as well given this repo is from opencode (well anomalyco)
A quick question but is there any tangible benefit of using these AIhubmix or others over something like opencode-zen itself that I may be missing?
wavemode | 22 hours ago
m_m_carvalho | 22 hours ago
sandeepkd | 22 hours ago
nit suggestion: It took a while to realize that I have to scroll to right to see more details. Most users are in habit of scrolling down or click on some button to see more details.
koolba | 21 hours ago
devmor | 17 hours ago
datadrivenangel | 17 hours ago
cassianoleal | 19 hours ago
giancarlostoro | 21 hours ago
jubilanti | 21 hours ago
There are literally dozens of existing projects that are doing what you are trying to do.
Insert XKCD standards reference here:
https://www.helicone.ai/llm-cost
https://pricepertoken.com/
https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/provider_registration/add_model...
https://artificialanalysis.ai/api-reference
https://github.com/simonw/llm-prices
https://github.com/assistant-ui/modelpedia
https://github.com/pydantic/genai-prices
https://github.com/Portkey-AI/models
https://github.com/truefoundry/models
https://github.com/agentstation/starmap
https://github.com/dcSpark/ai-model-catalog
https://github.com/mitkury/aimodels
https://github.com/nuxdie/ai-pricing
klustregrif | 21 hours ago
alexslobodnik | 16 hours ago
mathgeek | 16 hours ago
victorbjorklund | 11 hours ago
becomevocal | 16 hours ago
I always hope for the best when someone has a new list because of this. I want a de facto source!
rvz | 8 hours ago
varispeed | 19 hours ago
Cost per token says nothing. For instance if model goes dumb half way the task and you have to start again. If model does that all the time, then the cost is substantially higher than headline figure.
Probably such a service should constantly run various types of tasks on such models and gauge quality of output (though still provider can detect it and pin their best model to skew the results).
Zopieux | 18 hours ago
SilverSlash | 16 hours ago
Frannky | 16 hours ago
I was skeptical at first, but I tried using that and then asked Claude if the changes were okay, and they were, and the code works fine.
sixtyj | 12 hours ago
letssaythat | 10 hours ago
So I opted for the chinese version. I personally see them as a lesser evil.
regnard | 16 hours ago
This has been solid and I use this for my Open Source project RightModel: https://rightmodel.dev
smashah | 7 hours ago
dostick | 12 hours ago
immanuwell | 9 hours ago