I'd like to be able to search if any of my content made the list. Also search the entire stack for stuff not likely to rise high enough for its own category but definitely in there, like less popular languages to see what people are saying. I check HN every couple of hours all day long but its amazing the stuff that you can miss.
From the name, I was expecting it would be a spatial tool, i.e. some kind of semantic graph I could navigate. I think that is fruitful territory.
Edit: Oh hey! There is almost exactly what I was visualizing, on the Connections page! This is the coolest part, why isn't this on the front page? (Also, please add scroll to zoom!)
As for the grid, I don't see the value of pagination. I'd rather have it all on one page, so I can scroll, Ctrl+F, etc.
Also, like half of the first page are different kinds of AI? If we want to visualize what % of HN stuff is AI, maybe it would make sense to have a meta-category for that.
(Would also be cool if HN itself supported tags you could toggle... show/hide AI :)
I'm also very curious about the evolution of this data over time. The popularity stats seem to be limited to last 30 days. Would be cool to see stats for all time, and maybe filter by range. (Or graphs? Graphs are cool!)
I thought it's a collection of maps (what an atlas is). Instead it's a list, 9 items per page, 23 pages - it's an index.
A map lets you see the full picture in a glance.
It seems like a missed opportunity to actually make it an atlas.
One thing I've been doing lately is asking for "presidential briefings" on hot threads. I like to read the comments but some threads get really really dense and I just want the gist of it and to get a feel for the general sentiment so I task claude to do a 2 or 3 page max pdf with charts and literally just that a presidential style brief of wtf is going on. It never disappoints =)
- part of a major reason i want all the IPOs for frontier AI to crash badly is because I want it take out the AI hype completely from HN and go back to interesting stuff
- I am sorry to say this but "here is our new model XYZ with benchmarks ABC" is only interesting the first 65535 times you read it. after that my mind overflows
The count of posts are probably not a metric for quality though (not that you claimed it is), I would like to see at least the number of words accounted for! It might just be the case there are way too many more of two word sentences! :D (And it still would not be a good metric, not sure why I brought up quality exactly, I am just wondering what would actually be a good metric here for that. :P)
Can you add some statistics about comment lengths averages over time. I swear comments are substantially longer on average today than they were even just 1 year ago, but I might be seeing things. It's easy to assume why this is if it really is the case.
Looked at this for 20 seconds and wondered, where's the gigantic, planet-sized blob representing AI?
Is it not present because your classifier breaks things down into subtopics until the weightings are quasi-comparable? Or is it just not as hot a topic as I anecdotally perceive?
cowboylowrez | 20 hours ago
ActorNightly | 20 hours ago
rmason | 19 hours ago
andai | 19 hours ago
From the name, I was expecting it would be a spatial tool, i.e. some kind of semantic graph I could navigate. I think that is fruitful territory.
Edit: Oh hey! There is almost exactly what I was visualizing, on the Connections page! This is the coolest part, why isn't this on the front page? (Also, please add scroll to zoom!)
As for the grid, I don't see the value of pagination. I'd rather have it all on one page, so I can scroll, Ctrl+F, etc.
Also, like half of the first page are different kinds of AI? If we want to visualize what % of HN stuff is AI, maybe it would make sense to have a meta-category for that.
(Would also be cool if HN itself supported tags you could toggle... show/hide AI :)
I'm also very curious about the evolution of this data over time. The popularity stats seem to be limited to last 30 days. Would be cool to see stats for all time, and maybe filter by range. (Or graphs? Graphs are cool!)
magicmicah85 | 19 hours ago
cjlm | 19 hours ago
https://garphield.com as seen on https://gdb-engines.com/graph/query-languages/
alfg | 17 hours ago
random3 | 17 hours ago
livinglist | 16 hours ago
random3 | 6 hours ago
forgetfreeman | 16 hours ago
pelagicAustral | 15 hours ago
Boss0565 | 15 hours ago
vivzkestrel | 14 hours ago
- I am sorry to say this but "here is our new model XYZ with benchmarks ABC" is only interesting the first 65535 times you read it. after that my mind overflows
DylanMerigaud | 14 hours ago
hellon3wheels | 12 hours ago
nairboon | 12 hours ago
johnisgood | 13 hours ago
finger | 13 hours ago
kmaitreys | 13 hours ago
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49787436
DonHopkins | 9 hours ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNfTwGu9FpU
nephihaha | 12 hours ago
einsteinx2 | 10 hours ago
cowboylowrez | 2 hours ago
benfortuna | 10 hours ago
rkagerer | an hour ago
Is it not present because your classifier breaks things down into subtopics until the weightings are quasi-comparable? Or is it just not as hot a topic as I anecdotally perceive?