QotNews
Hacker News, Reddit, Lobsters, and Tildes articles rendered in reader mode.

Show HN: Turn raw HTML into production-ready images for free

View article
128 points by alvinunreal 17 hours ago on hackernews | 72 comments

eastoeast | 17 hours ago

This is a great idea. I can’t believe I didn’t think of this, given I generate and screenshot so many “poster images” in html just like this. Haven’t played around a ton but seems intuitive. Nice work!

xiaohanyu | 16 hours ago

Maybe webp is a better target than png?

dtagames | 16 hours ago

It's not. JPG, I could live with but please not webp.

Mogzol | 14 hours ago

Why? I assume the intention is to show these images on a webpage somewhere. WebP is well-supported by browsers and can store lossless images at better compression ratios than PNG, so why not use it? I don't think using a lossy format like JPEG makes much sense. JPEG is a fine format for photos, but for HTML content rendered as an image I assume most people would want a lossless format so you don't get artifacts.

kaizenb | 13 hours ago

Definitely should be WebP.

dtagames | 4 hours ago

Because it's impossible to use in other tools. Only browsers get it. But I agree about lossy images for text.

benatkin | 15 hours ago

No, because their domain is png /s

I thought webp would be better for this and checked again just to be sure, and yes, it would be better for this. WebP is quite well supported, albeit not as well supported as png, and it can have significantly smaller file sizes for the same lossless image as png.

RyanShook | 15 hours ago

Nice! It definitely makes you wonder when is MCP actually needed vs just giving the LLM API calls to work with.

chevman | 15 hours ago

Any similar AI based services/agents that can take images/creative assets (eg Figma, Sketch, Adobe PS, etc files) and create production-ready emails and landing pages in HTML?

geooff_ | 15 hours ago

Very cool. Is there an option to self-host? This seems like it could be a cool agent skill.

threeducks | 12 hours ago

HTML to PNG:

    chromium --headless --disable-gpu --screenshot=output.png --window-size=1920,1080 --hide-scrollbars index.html
Also works great for HTML to PDF:

    chromium --headless --disable-gpu --no-pdf-header-footer --run-all-compositor-stages-before-draw --print-to-pdf=output.pdf index.html

Retr0id | 14 hours ago

What differentiates production-ready images from regular images?

apeters | 13 hours ago

They are cloud-native, of course.

yeasku | 9 hours ago

Is this post a joke?

KellyCriterion | 8 hours ago

Do they support also DeFi or Blockchain then?

aembleton | 5 hours ago

Yes, and AI

KellyCriterion | 4 hours ago

++1 :-))

good one!!!

RadiozRadioz | 13 hours ago

They're bedazzled by a little bit of marketing flair.

Generally I find production-ready images have more synergy and tend to be web-scale. Often they're built from the ground up for AI & are blazing fast, at scale, and empower your team whilst unlocking new possibilities. As my sibling comment suggests, being cloud-native is a crucial factor too.

4ndrewl | 11 hours ago

Downvoted for not starting with "Great question!" /s

ludicrousdispla | 10 hours ago

If I need more flair can I embed the image in a new html page and then create another image from that?

estebarb | 3 hours ago

I'm confused. It was sarcasm?

lima | 2 hours ago

Hard to say these days!

back2reddit | 11 hours ago

It's not an image—it's an image on the edge.

No cruft. No legacy formats.

Just buttery smooth production readiness.

andrecarini | 10 hours ago

Thanks ChatGPT

b0ner_t0ner | 9 hours ago

> buttery smooth

But buttery bloated if the images don't run OptiPNG before exporting.

xgulfie | 5 hours ago

But are they Blazing Fast (rocket ship emoji)? Are they vibe ready?

jsight | 4 hours ago

It probably means that the text was generated by an AI.

Claude Code loves to say that everything is production ready, even if it doesn't quite compile or pass automated tests yet.

vbezhenar | 30 minutes ago

Production-ready image can be scaled effortlessly both in vertical and horizontal direction.

tbrownaw | 14 hours ago

Playwright behind a web server?

franze | 7 hours ago

well, you can create an image that reports the internal, this is what i got:

  - IP: 104.28.157.29
  - Org: Cloudflare (AS13335)
  - Location: Narita, Chiba, Japan
  - Browser: Chrome 126.0.0.0 headless
  - Automation: Puppeteer/Playwright
  - navigator.webdriver: true
  - Platform: Linux x86_64
  - CPU cores: 4
  - WebGL: ANGLE + Vulkan 1.3.0 + SwiftShader
  - GPU: SwiftShader (software rendering)
  - Screen: 1024x768 virtual
  - DevicePixelRatio: 2
  - Color depth: 16 bit
  - Window: 500x88 outer (headless)
  - Languages: en-US
  - Plugins: 5
  - Frontend: Nuxt.js
  - Storage: ephemeral blob

oefrha | 13 hours ago

I’m afraid out of all the waiting strategies available in Puppeteer/Playwright, waiting a fixed period is the worst possible. Maybe consider exposing the proper waiting strategies, load/domcontentloaded/networkidle, maybe even the more fine-grained ones https://playwright.dev/docs/actionability

Retr0id | 13 hours ago

I did some tests and it didn't seem like a fixed wait, when I kept making network requests the render timed out entirely.

oefrha | 12 hours ago

I made the comment based on the delay parameter (“Wait time in ms.”) in the API. I didn’t test so don’t know what the default behavior is.

jihchi | 13 hours ago

This is cool! One use case is generating a Mermaid diagram as an image. For example, you can use the following HTML[^1]:

  <!doctype html>
  <html lang="en">
    <body>
      <pre class="mermaid">
    graph LR
        A --- B
        B-->C[fa:fa-ban forbidden]
        B-->D(fa:fa-spinner);
      </pre>
      <script type="module">
        import mermaid from 'https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/mermaid@11/dist/mermaid.esm.min.mjs';
      </script>
    </body>
  </html>
Then html2png.dev will serve you:

  https://html2png.dev/api/blob/oTVGhhCc6rDZYQFDIE3EGkcKs-KO6J9-_DHs-jO2OJc-d23fb4f2.png
[^1]: https://mermaid.js.org/config/usage.html#simple-full-example

JimDabell | 13 hours ago

Why wouldn’t you just use Mermaid to generate the PNG directly?

Garlef | 12 hours ago

One reason I could think of: Fewer dependencies that need integration

JimDabell | 10 hours ago

By introducing a dependency on a third-party service with no SLA? This seems to make the dependency situation worse.

mcny | 7 hours ago

Ah haha. I love this conversation of trying to find a product market fit in public.

What if the input to the JavaScript (mermaid in this case) is not trusted to run on the end client machines but by running untrusted input on a sandbox (this service, or self hosted idk) is somehow acceptable and the output a blob of an image is acceptable to display on the actual client machines.

Takes the planets to align just right and need us to squint just enough but I think we can find something if we look hard enough.

But then mermaid can simply output PNG so you could run it as a worker... Thinking...

reassess_blind | 13 hours ago

I thought this was satire. Usually you want to go from image to HTML, not the other way around. I suppose it does have its uses, though.

devmor | 13 hours ago

It certainly does, that's why it's been a common dev tool for a bit over 20 years. I'm not really sure what the point of OP making it a web app is, though.

spiderfarmer | 5 hours ago

So why comment?

agentifysh | 12 hours ago

that "Not MCP" is so refreshing it makes me laugh out loud

it's literally waht i've been saying all along when I came across mcp "why can't i just give agent a prompt and it will run the rest api calls for me"

there's still some MCPs which makes sense but we have it for literally everything when just a prompt will do the job!

now on the topic of html2png i do wonder is this like the self-hostable version on github https://github.com/maranemil/HTML2Png where they use canvas? or is this something else ?

jumploops | 12 hours ago

Love the simplicity and “Not MCP” callout (:

Not that it matters, but curious what percentage of this service was “vibe-coded”?

WilcoKruijer | 11 hours ago

I’ve been doing this manually by having a static development-only route on my website and taking a “node screenshot” using the Chrome developer tools. This is definitely a better way, well done!

me_bx | 11 hours ago

Congrats on launching, beautiful design.

I'm not sure of what "production ready" is supposed to mean here, but the demo image is not optimized, `optipng` command decreases its size by 53.21%.

kristopolous | 8 hours ago

also don't ignore webp and avif ... those can really do wonders.

[OP] alvinunreal | 8 hours ago

Thank you. Can add png compression too right.

spiderfarmer | 5 hours ago

The bots using these images apply their own compression anyway.

the_arun | 2 hours ago

Curious - How did you find the image is not optimized? Is there a tool to find it?

derefr | an hour ago

> I'm not sure of what "production ready" is supposed to mean here

Given this text at the bottom:

> The high-performance HTML to PNG engine. Built for developers, agents, and automation. Completely free to use. All generated assets are public and ephemeral.

...I assume the implications are that:

1. this service will scale to meet request load without QoS degradation (i.e. it's probably running on FaaS infra), rather than being a fixed-size slowly-elastic cluster that would get choked out if your downstream service got popular and flooded it with thousands of concurrent requests

2. you can directly take the URLs the service spits out, and serve them to your downstream service's clients, without worrying much about deliverability, because there's an object store + edge CDN involved.

In other words, it's not just a single headless-chromium instance running on a box somewhere; you could actually use this thing as an upstream dependency and rely on it.

> the demo image is not optimized, `optipng` command decreases its size by 53.21%

Given that the author's imagined use-case is giving non-multimodal LLMs a way to emit visuals (the prompt at the bottom of the page starts "When asked to create visuals, charts, or mockups"), I think their idea is that the resulting rendered images would more-likely-than-not only be requested once, immediately, to display the result to the same user who caused the prompt to be evaluated.

Where, in that case, the metric of concern isn't "time+bytes cost for each marginal fetch of the resulting image from the CDN"; but rather "end-to-end wall-clock time required to load the HTML in the headless browser, bake the image, push it to the object store, and serve it once to the requesting user."

OptiPNG would slightly lower that last "serve it once" cost, but massively inflate the "bake the image" time, making it not worth it.

(I suppose they could add image optimization as something you could turn on — but "image optimization at the edge" is already a commodity product you can get from numerous vendors, e.g. Cloudflare.)

rognjen | 10 hours ago

It's nice looking for sure but much more complex than using `wkhtmltox` with `pngquant`, `optipng` and/or ImageMagick `convert` locally - esp. since the learning curve seems to be about equivalent.

krick | 9 hours ago

Yeah, I thought that as well. So I was wondering if that's some kind of a joke, or maybe modern html is so fucked up that all usual solutions became obsolete since the last time I did that.

mewpmewp2 | 7 hours ago

Won't you need to install extra libraries for these?

randoments | 10 hours ago

What is the use case for requiring this?

mattrighetti | 8 hours ago

Dynamic og:image generator could be a use case.

Think of the GitHub thumbnails where the PR number changes constantly and has to be reflected on the image preview

albert_e | 8 hours ago

This looks interesting though niche -- am yet to think of a compelling use case.

I am sure @simonw has some ideas :) -- he recently blogged about HTML tools which is also one or my favorite use cases for LLMs.

Maybe similar to SVG generation, this could be a more powerful / flexible way to generate complex images / screen mockups and the like on-the-fly.

PS: How do the economics work -- how is this free to use?

PS2: The live HTML editor seems buggy. Cursor is off by one position and messes up editing. (chrome on windows)

onion2k | 5 hours ago

Alternatively, open devtools, press ctrl+shift+p (or cmd+shift+p on a mac) to open the command palette, search for 'screenshot' and choose 'Capture full size screenshot' to do the same thing on your browser. There's 'area screenshot' for selecting an area, 'screenshot' for the viewport', and even 'node screenshot' for capturing the selected DOM node.

spiderfarmer | 5 hours ago

Yeah and you can also take a picture with your phone. Or draw with pencil and paper.

[OP] alvinunreal | 4 hours ago

I just take pictures with my instant polaroid

thatgerhard | 5 hours ago

This must be the hardest way to create an image online ever invented.

stronglikedan | 2 hours ago

but it's "high-performance"!

xnx | 4 hours ago

Sharing in case anyone isn't familiar with this built-in capability:

google-chrome --headless --screenshot=my_screenshot.png https://www.example.com

stronglikedan | 2 hours ago

This is for the dozen or so people that don't have Chrome installed.

nabeards | 2 hours ago

I personally haven't had Chrome installed anywhere in years. I think there are more than a dozen of us!

DemocracyFTW2 | an hour ago

(checks list) --Mh, yah so, you've got a point there (scribbles, smiles, extends hand) --Welcome dear Sir or Madam, or, as we will call you, Number Thirteen!

thekevan | 21 minutes ago

I have this PC for over 2 years and did not realize I didn't have Chrome installed until Google's Antigravity prompted me to do so for its agent.

So it's installed now but still un-personalized like it was installed 5 minutes ago. I don't use it except with Antigravity.

Lord_Zero | 23 minutes ago

It looks like this app has helpful functions for size, format, and transparency that you can't do with the built in chrome command all at once without probably piping it through inagemagik or something. And even then maybe this site renders the html responsively before rasterizing.

donohoe | 4 hours ago

“Free”?

What’s the catch, or how I can I be sure it will still be around in 3 months?

No snark, genuinely curious as I would use this if I could count on it.

leptons | 2 hours ago

The only tech you can trust to be around is the tech you control. And even then it's still a bit iffy if you didn't write all the code yourself and you host it on someone else's servers.

Yash16 | 3 hours ago

What’s the purpose of creating this?

scosman | 2 hours ago

Looks great for opengraph images.

dom96 | 38 minutes ago

Why HTML? Why not SVG?

I created an svg to png API to generate open graph images a while back. It works pretty well and can be hosted on Cloudflare Workers for free.

https://github.com/dom96/svg-renderer