This is long overdue but it’s great to see. The new website is really fast, and I guess they are proud of the speed because I typed in [dns] and it responded “352 results in 4ms”.
They’ve just published RFC 9991. They pre-assign RFC numbers at some point during the publication process so I expect they are already well past the point that the old tools could no longer cope…
In particular, it was clear that the current tools could not support the editing or publication of RFC 10,000 and beyond.
fanf | a day ago
This is long overdue but it’s great to see. The new website is really fast, and I guess they are proud of the speed because I typed in [dns] and it responded “352 results in 4ms”.
They’ve just published RFC 9991. They pre-assign RFC numbers at some point during the publication process so I expect they are already well past the point that the old tools could no longer cope…
alandekok | 21 hours ago
RFC 9965 for me!
mdaniel | a day ago
I can't tell you how thrilled I was to see that this submission does not have the vibecoding tag on it
Vaelatern | 11 hours ago
"As a (lobsters) discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving (vibecoding) approaches one."
leela | 5 hours ago